All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 8th, 2016, 15:09 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
ST1000dl002
Barracuda LP
PN 9TT153-570
FW CC98
some times it showing in bios only
not shows in windows
I checked with terminal
heads
F3 T>/7X

Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 8th, 2016, 22:50 
Offline

Joined: March 19th, 2015, 15:01
Posts: 1387
Location: isreal
Most likely taking care on sysfile 93 + hardware imaging will do


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 9th, 2016, 2:54 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
jermy wrote:
Most likely taking care on sysfile 93 + hardware imaging will do

Can you explain me please?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 9th, 2016, 3:02 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 15461
Location: Australia
Type "F" at level T and post the output.

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 9th, 2016, 8:43 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
fzabkar wrote:
Type "F" at level T and post the output.

Sir I attached F3 T> F level output


Attachments:
F.TXT [75.32 KiB]
Downloaded 865 times
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 9th, 2016, 14:09 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 15461
Location: Australia
I believe that issuing the following commands (at level T) will achieve the same end as jermy is suggesting.

    F,"READ_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F."WRITE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F,"OFFLINE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F,"DAR_ENABLED",0,22
    F,"DISABLE_IDLE_ACTIVITY",1,22
    F,"BGMS_DISABLE_DATA_REFRESH",1,22
    F,"ABORT_PREFETCH",1,22
    F,"READ_LOOKAHEAD_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22
    F,"READ_CACHING_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22

You might like to read the following thread before proceeding.

Seagate F3 Arch - Patching the 093 sysfile :
http://www.hddoracle.com/viewtopic.php?f=59&t=1842

After making the changes, I would dump the full set of parameters again. then compare them against your first F list.

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 10th, 2016, 0:24 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 15461
Location: Australia
Sorry, I think that should have been ...

    F"READ_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F."WRITE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F"OFFLINE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F"DAR_ENABLED",0,22
    F"DISABLE_IDLE_ACTIVITY",1,22
    F"BGMS_DISABLE_DATA_REFRESH",1,22
    F"ABORT_PREFETCH",1,22
    F"READ_LOOKAHEAD_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22
    F"READ_CACHING_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 10th, 2016, 6:49 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2014, 4:57
Posts: 219
Location: Remote Raid Help on planet Earth
prasadsv wrote:
Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Apparently, head 0 is not completely ok. I prefer to check it by testing sysfile 181 before any attempts to fix SA.

_________________
http://www.alfadatarecovery.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 10th, 2016, 11:27 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Martin wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Apparently, head 0 is not completely ok. I prefer to check it by testing sysfile 181 before any attempts to fix SA.

with what command?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 10th, 2016, 15:29 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Martin wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Apparently, head 0 is not completely ok. I prefer to check it by testing sysfile 181 before any attempts to fix SA.

I attached sysfile181


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 11th, 2016, 2:07 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2014, 4:57
Posts: 219
Location: Remote Raid Help on planet Earth
prasadsv wrote:
Martin wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Apparently, head 0 is not completely ok. I prefer to check it by testing sysfile 181 before any attempts to fix SA.

with what command?


Just RW test. What kind of tool do you use?

_________________
http://www.alfadatarecovery.com


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 11th, 2016, 7:10 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Martin wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Martin wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Head 00 Resistance 00D7
Head 01 Resistance 0160
Head 02 Resistance 0119


Apparently, head 0 is not completely ok. I prefer to check it by testing sysfile 181 before any attempts to fix SA.

with what command?


Just RW test. What kind of tool do you use?

I have only TTL adoptor using through hyper terminal
It's not detecting in bios too(sometimes) no detection in windows
after waiting long time
Iam getting
Rst 0x20M
(P) SATA Reset

ASCII Diag mode

F3 T>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 11th, 2016, 7:30 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Spildit wrote:
fzabkar wrote:
Sorry, I think that should have been ...

    F"READ_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F."WRITE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F"OFFLINE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
    F"DAR_ENABLED",0,22
    F"DISABLE_IDLE_ACTIVITY",1,22
    F"BGMS_DISABLE_DATA_REFRESH",1,22
    F"ABORT_PREFETCH",1,22
    F"READ_LOOKAHEAD_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22
    F"READ_CACHING_DISABLED_ON_POWER_UP",1,22



+

F3 T>F"RWRecoveryFlags",00,22
F3 T>F"BGMSFlags",00,22
F3 T>F"PerformanceFlags",043C,22
F3 T>F"MediaCacheControl",00,22

I nothing happens


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 11th, 2016, 17:41 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Spildit wrote:
Post terminal LOG.

Are you willing to pay something for the recovery ?

hdd SENT TO U?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 11th, 2016, 17:59 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
prasadsv wrote:
Spildit wrote:
Post terminal LOG.

Are you willing to pay something for the recovery ?

hdd SENT TO U?

FOR aLL COMMANDS U MENTIONED i'M GETTING
OUTPUT
(D) SATA Reset


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 13th, 2016, 18:21 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Spildit wrote:
And of course plug the drive to TTL on the computer that you will send Teamviewer ID.


Today I open the drive I have seen heads bended up. It has only one head on each arm
Nothing happens on platter surface


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 13th, 2016, 18:27 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Spildit wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Spildit wrote:
And of course plug the drive to TTL on the computer that you will send Teamviewer ID.

Today I open the drive I have seen heads bended up. It has only one head on each arm


Did you replace them ? Can you image the drive now ?

I told you .... if you were to continue you would mess up the drive for sure....

I have to find donor
Can I use heads from bad sector drives?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: December 13th, 2016, 18:40 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 3rd, 2011, 0:19
Posts: 2003
Location: Providence, RI
This is how I feel for Spildit just reading this thread:

Attachment:
giphy.gif
giphy.gif [ 935.58 KiB | Viewed 7646 times ]


Sadly a little information in the wrong hands is a very dangerous thing to play around with.

_________________
Data Medics - Hard Drive, SSD, and RAID Data Recovery Service Company


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: st1000dl002
PostPosted: March 24th, 2017, 17:03 
Offline

Joined: February 22nd, 2016, 6:39
Posts: 114
Location: india
Spildit wrote:
prasadsv wrote:
Can I use heads from bad sector drives?


If you are sure that the "Bad sectors" are not caused the inability of the head to read .... And if you are sure that the heads were not damaged by the bad sectors .....

:? :? :? :?

I would start by using a proper drive that you are sure to be working fine and not some junk drives to save costs ....

But at this point your client is already screwed i guess .... Starting to think that it was a BAD idea to advice you in the first place.

If you couldn't do the recovery you should have told your client to send the drive to another place or to outsource it yourself.

It's no longer safe to proceed any further.


Finaly i got same drive and replaced heads
Got all data (5gb loss in windows partion ) easily


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 19 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 79 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group