June 22nd, 2017, 17:24
data-medics wrote:quote="data-medics"]data-medics wrote:Wouldn't the data recovery community be a better place if people actually shared their knowledge with each other?
You really think that Seagate keeps 100% separation of their manufacturing and data recovery businesses? If you believe that I've got a bridge I want to sell you.
June 22nd, 2017, 17:25
BGman wrote:Doomer wrote:It means that you are useful to nobody since you know everything....
data-medics wrote:Then I could be researching something else, instead of trying to re-invent something that someone else already knows, and then I could be sharing that information with the community.
June 23rd, 2017, 6:20
Doomer wrote:data-medics wrote:Wouldn't the data recovery community be a better place if people actually shared their knowledge with each other?
Most people who want the knowledge(that they don't know) to be shared cannot give anything to the sharing person in return
Only a few people can be useful to each other and those people already sharing, just not with everybody
June 23rd, 2017, 7:38
June 23rd, 2017, 16:36
data-medics wrote:Wouldn't the data recovery community be a better place if people actually shared their knowledge with each other?
We'd all be having 20-30% better success rates and making more money, with less wasted time on R&D, if we just shared what we know with each other. But, a few people always want to horde what they figure out to themselves (such as how to unlock these) hoping that someone will be willing to pay their $5000 rate to unlock it for you. I've personally just decided to not acknowledge these guys. I won't even recommend a customer to them if I believe they have the solution (often these guys are just lying and saying they have a solution when they really don't).
June 23rd, 2017, 18:20
June 23rd, 2017, 18:39
scratchy wrote:If you think people do not spend 2k or more on a recovery, how do Ontrack stay in business ?
June 24th, 2017, 4:07
scratchy wrote:....
If you think people do not spend 2k or more on a recovery, how do Ontrack stay in business ?
June 24th, 2017, 4:15
data-medics wrote:scratchy wrote:If you think people do not spend 2k or more on a recovery, how do Ontrack stay in business ?
I know there are people willing to pay these prices, but they're about 1% of the total cases out there. They're the same 1% of people who'd probably opt to send their drive to a place charging that much even if other companies could do it for 1/4 that cost.
I'm not saying that research isn't worth anything, it certainly is. But, I also think there is a culture of price gouging in this industry whenever you know something others haven't figured out yet. At least be willing to sell what you know to other companies, or turn it into a service you offer at a rate others can afford to use and still turn a profit in the end. Heck, make a program that can do it and charge for the unlocks by a pay-per-unlock token system.
Anyway, I've caught wind that Ace has already cracked unlocking these drives, so it's just a matter of time before that gravy train ends. I've got a few customers that I've told to just hold off and wait for recovery, and that's what they're doing.
Hopefully, they're working on the F3 ROM issue as well. I know enough people have requested it.
June 24th, 2017, 4:22
Martin wrote:scratchy wrote:....
If you think people do not spend 2k or more on a recovery, how do Ontrack stay in business ?
Really interesting question. Having an ordinary/mediocre service, strange branch policy, and such prices they shouldn't have it. Only one thing they do well is the advertisment, probably, there is the key.
June 24th, 2017, 4:27
Hopefully, they're working on the F3 ROM issue as well. I know enough people have requested it.
June 24th, 2017, 8:22
pepe wrote:Anyway, the question remains: do you tell your clients there is solution for their drives??
pepe
June 24th, 2017, 9:23
scratchy wrote:Martin wrote:scratchy wrote:....
If you think people do not spend 2k or more on a recovery, how do Ontrack stay in business ?
Really interesting question. Having an ordinary/mediocre service, strange branch policy, and such prices they shouldn't have it. Only one thing they do well is the advertisment, probably, there is the key.
They have, lets say, an 'Interesting' pricing system'
June 24th, 2017, 9:28
data-medics wrote:pepe wrote:Anyway, the question remains: do you tell your clients there is solution for their drives??
pepe
I do. I also tell them how badly they can expect to charged for the service. So far, none of my clients have opted to take that route.
I realize that rebuilding an F3 ROM is far more complicated than unlocking a drive. And I do understand why that service has to cost more. My gripe is more related to those unwilling to share the unlock procedure, which is what this thread was originally about. Something that actually requires a serious investment of time on each case obviously is worth more.
June 24th, 2017, 12:33
June 24th, 2017, 16:40
beto wrote:its the same like why people who are getting access to SSD based on SandForce encryption are not sharing how does they are doing that ?
Through a special agreement with SandForce, DriveSavers is authorized and recommended to perform data recovery on SandForce data storage devices
June 25th, 2017, 16:31
July 24th, 2017, 9:27
July 24th, 2017, 9:31
scratchy wrote:Sandforce encryption for some controllers was hacked some years ago.
http://techreport.com/news/23096/256-bi ... ontrollers
Keep up
July 24th, 2017, 10:16
data-medics wrote:So it looks like Ace just released an update that can now unlock more of these "Diagnostic Port Locked" Seagate drives.
Time to pay them for an update and get what no one was willing to share. Too bad for those guys who already knew how to do this, a week ago I'd have gladly paid $1,500 to anyone willing to share their technique to do this manually. Now, I'm paying that to Ace for the upgrade.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.