| HDD GURU FORUMS http://forum.hddguru.com/ |
|
| DE raw recovery - poor results http://forum.hddguru.com/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=35271 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | andy17d [ April 21st, 2017, 17:08 ] |
| Post subject: | DE raw recovery - poor results |
I got a car camera (DVR) with deleted movies. Analysis of the FAT partition has allowed to retrieve 7 movies. In raw mode, I recovered 3 videos. And finally - free photorec has retrieved 15 films! Am I doing something wrong or Data Extractor cannot cope with raw recovery mode? |
|
| Author: | Martin [ April 22nd, 2017, 2:22 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
DE is not the best option in the world, as the other solutions it has positive and negative features. In your case, the specialized program just did its job better then DE. Probably, manual work will give even better result. |
|
| Author: | einstein9 [ April 22nd, 2017, 3:43 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
Martin wrote: DE is not the best option in the world, as the other solutions it has positive and negative features. In your case, the specialized program just did its job better then DE. Probably, manual work will give even better result. Not always, we created a custom Headers for some special formats (i.e. DVR`s) you will need to Know it more my friend n dig more.. @andy17d Car DVR`s usually saves to MicroSD memories, FAT & formatted (re-recording after) will not help much you will get partial clips IF FOUND good luck |
|
| Author: | andy17d [ April 22nd, 2017, 5:32 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
einstein9 wrote: Car DVR`s usually saves to MicroSD memories, FAT & formatted (re-recording after) will not help much you will get partial clips IF FOUND good luck This model has a built-in memory formatted in FAT. Fortunately, when connected to the computer is full access to this memory. I have recovered data in raw mode. I am only disappointed by the low effectiveness of DE, much worse than the free photorec. I thought initially it was a matter of setting a step value. However, even setting to 1 hasn't changed anything. |
|
| Author: | einstein9 [ April 22nd, 2017, 12:38 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
I really don`t think that DE can be judged by RAW results (compared with other Apps) the real power is really somewhere else. in Addition, you can create a custom RAW list for DE and import it to the list (they added this option recently) but again, your case is FLASH related NOT HDD |
|
| Author: | fzabkar [ April 22nd, 2017, 20:07 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
einstein9 wrote: ... but again, your case is FLASH related NOT HDD Why should that make any difference in the OP's case, assuming it is in fact a standard FAT file system? |
|
| Author: | einstein9 [ April 23rd, 2017, 4:31 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
fzabkar wrote: einstein9 wrote: ... but again, your case is FLASH related NOT HDD Why should that make any difference in the OP's case, assuming it is in fact a standard FAT file system? Am sorry to tell you this "My friend" I can tell you don`t do this... its not good.. but WHY? i prefer to keep it for myself... |
|
| Author: | fzabkar [ April 23rd, 2017, 4:44 ] |
| Post subject: | Re: DE raw recovery - poor results |
My question was rhetorical. That is, there is no difference in this case. It is a purely logical recovery. |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ] |
| Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|