Discussions related to PC-3000
Please no pirated software here!
February 6th, 2018, 17:04
Not the first time I have seen it, and I am sure there is a perfectly good reason, but why is it when I sometimes do a ‘calculate size’ on the full root of a HFS partition, i discover the amount of calculated Data is larger than the size of the drive?
For Example I have a 1TB drive that I can read perfectly, but with Data Extractor, the amount of extractable data is 1.4TB.
February 6th, 2018, 18:56
I think the answer is related to the private data folder and also the time machine backup folder possibly having multiple versions of the same files. I can see it hard to justify/explain the discrepancy of extra data to a customer, especially in the cases of an almost full drive recovery needing to go to a larger destination drive. I guess to be safe, and if it were possible, when dealing with HFS, would be to do a direct to disk (sector by sector clone), rather than a file copy to drive.
Anyone have any thoughts on this?
February 7th, 2018, 10:45
You could be seeing folder with metadata, which contains hardlinks, and they are counted as files.
March 27th, 2018, 2:31
Dmitri wrote:You could be seeing folder with metadata, which contains hardlinks, and they are counted as files.
Thanks for the reply Dmitri. Yes, it does appear to be the reason. I compared a good HFS volume in FINDER and in DE and it appears to be the reason. I believe the folder can be ignored when extracting.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.