Switch to full style
Anything related to computer forensics (new section!)
Post a reply

Re: Cryptolocker

February 5th, 2016, 15:24

michael chiklis wrote:This means that now if someone gets infected even by old cryptolocker version then he wouldn't be able to get his data back.
This is sad!

Even if they did, this service would never work. The keys they had were only for those already infected at the time of seizure. Any new infections would have a new key that would never work with the service anyway. At least that is how I understand it to be.

Re: Cryptolocker

February 5th, 2016, 20:54

I can crack TeslaCrypt and variants of TeslaCrypt 2.0 due to a design flaw. However that flaw has been patched in december, so no way jose for 3.0

Re: Cryptolocker

February 8th, 2016, 4:30

.ccc, .vvv, .xyz, .abc, .aaa, .zzz, .ecc, .ezz, and .ecx.
are easily decrypted.
There is no solution (yet) for .micro, .xxx and .ttt (these are Tesla 3.0)

Re: Cryptolocker

February 20th, 2016, 23:57

Thank you.

Re: Cryptolocker

May 20th, 2016, 22:50

northwind wrote:.ccc, .vvv, .xyz, .abc, .aaa, .zzz, .ecc, .ezz, and .ecx.
are easily decrypted.
There is no solution (yet) for .micro, .xxx and .ttt (these are Tesla 3.0)


update, there is now. just tested a .xx and decoder works after master key was released :) yay! http://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/security/teslacrypt-shuts-down-and-releases-master-decryption-key/

Re: Cryptolocker

May 31st, 2016, 3:20

that some link does not open.

Re: Cryptolocker

May 31st, 2016, 4:48

http://www.hddoracle.com/viewtopic.php?t=1583&p=8688
Post a reply