December 24th, 2015, 14:34
December 28th, 2015, 10:37
December 29th, 2015, 5:21
DRUG wrote:Platter has some decent damage in there, how much were you willing to spend on that recovery process ?
December 29th, 2015, 5:35
borjacc wrote:DRUG wrote:Platter has some decent damage in there, how much were you willing to spend on that recovery process ?
The data stored in there is quite important. First of all i would like to know if its possible to recover some data. Some expert said me that all data is unrecoverable because head will be damaged when try to read damaged surface. Is that true?
Thanks.
December 29th, 2015, 8:11
borjacc wrote:We have a NAS emc celerra NS20 (old)...
We bring this disk to a recovery data service and said us that surface is scratched and data is unrecoverable.
December 29th, 2015, 10:00
Dmitri wrote:borjacc wrote:We have a NAS emc celerra NS20 (old)...
We bring this disk to a recovery data service and said us that surface is scratched and data is unrecoverable.
What's the drive model?
To me it looks like FC or SAS. If so, then chances are slim to none.
If necessary, I can help with remote recovery from this EMC NAS using the image of the drive failed in 2013, but you can guess the quality of results.
December 30th, 2015, 12:45
Then it's a death sentence, unfortunately.borjacc wrote:The drive is Seagate cheetah fc from 2008 with sca 40 pins.
Yes, and quite extensive one, despite all the acquisitions EMC made previously.borjacc wrote:Do you have experience with emc nas?
December 31st, 2015, 14:30
borjacc wrote:Dmitri wrote:borjacc wrote:We have a NAS emc celerra NS20 (old)...
We bring this disk to a recovery data service and said us that surface is scratched and data is unrecoverable.
What's the drive model?
To me it looks like FC or SAS. If so, then chances are slim to none.
If necessary, I can help with remote recovery from this EMC NAS using the image of the drive failed in 2013, but you can guess the quality of results.
The drive is Seagate cheetah fc from 2008 with sca 40 pins.
Do you have experience with emc nas?
December 31st, 2015, 14:32
borjacc wrote:Last disk faulted surface.
December 31st, 2015, 18:18
Amarbir wrote:borjacc wrote:Last disk faulted surface.
Well,
0 to 5 Heads Can Definately Be Imaged Leaving The Last Top Head [ Assuming its The Only One Defective ] .But It Would Be a Task To Clean Wipe All Other Platters due to Top Platter Debris Scattered All Across .
January 5th, 2016, 6:58
hdd_sand wrote:Amarbir wrote:borjacc wrote:Last disk faulted surface.
Well,
0 to 5 Heads Can Definately Be Imaged Leaving The Last Top Head [ Assuming its The Only One Defective ] .But It Would Be a Task To Clean Wipe All Other Platters due to Top Platter Debris Scattered All Across .
I don't agree with this at all! and FC with media damage and do selective cloning?!?!?! it's no going to happen, if the top surface has that damage, for sure the other surfaces are fubar IMHO
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.