February 1st, 2017, 16:04
February 1st, 2017, 18:17
February 2nd, 2017, 6:38
February 2nd, 2017, 9:20
February 2nd, 2017, 9:50
February 2nd, 2017, 11:47
Someone told me that their software doesn't work as it should and the the restored image of a drive will have worse performance because of the drivers weren't installed properly (o_O ?!?).
February 2nd, 2017, 13:22
February 2nd, 2017, 18:05
If you use the options on the software to do a full drive image/clone then no matter what software you use as long as it doesn't have any bugs the restored image/clone should be identical, because it should be an exact copy of the drive on the moment you took the image. If this doesn't happen then your imaging software is not working as expected or your original drive is damaged (or the destination drive is damaged).
February 3rd, 2017, 17:25
February 5th, 2017, 11:45
February 5th, 2017, 15:47
Bellzemos wrote:So AOMEI Backupper Standard (Free) should do the job fine, right? My friend says that the systems (computers) which HDD have the recovered image from another (same HW) computer won't perform optimally. I always tought that an image is an image, no matter the tool and that it should work exactly the same.
AOMEI offer an exact sector-by-sector imaging of a drive but I don't use that option. I guess that would image empty sectors as well, I don't do/need that.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.