January 22nd, 2018, 22:32
January 23rd, 2018, 9:21
January 23rd, 2018, 21:20
June 18th, 2018, 15:00
June 19th, 2018, 10:54
jermy wrote:https://apextoollab.com/
affordable and good
June 20th, 2018, 21:28
June 27th, 2018, 17:50
Paulfromsurrey wrote:Thank you Spildit!!!!! very good link
how you compare apextools with hddurgery
June 28th, 2018, 15:51
Spildit wrote:Amarbir[CDR-Labs] wrote:(...)I think its time i make a comprehensive video on youtube on this matter
GREAT !!! I do love your videos !
June 28th, 2018, 19:11
June 29th, 2018, 7:11
June 29th, 2018, 7:32
June 30th, 2018, 12:16
labtech wrote:There isn't one as it is a free moving tool. Therefore implying the risk of screw up. True.
June 30th, 2018, 18:07
July 1st, 2018, 11:56
labtech wrote:I am good. I really don't care, I know what I am doing. So no need to make videos for me.
July 1st, 2018, 12:34
July 2nd, 2018, 2:56
labtech wrote:
With all that in mind, no head replacement tool is perfect to all people working with it. Any one person can find something they don't like about a tool, whether it is material, design, the actual process of working with it, necessary accessories, etc. Cannot please everyone. Not everybody likes Hyundai, Kia or Mercedes or Ferrari.
.
July 2nd, 2018, 7:58
helpdisc wrote:labtech wrote:
With all that in mind, no head replacement tool is perfect to all people working with it. Any one person can find something they don't like about a tool, whether it is material, design, the actual process of working with it, necessary accessories, etc. Cannot please everyone. Not everybody likes Hyundai, Kia or Mercedes or Ferrari.
.
I would concentrate only on technical aspect. It is not about if I like Kia or Hyundai.
This type of tools ( so called E type ) have serious flaws. First one is that they have fundamental problem.
Basing height on mold is wrong. Cast parts ( hdd housing ) dimensions variations are to big. You put tool down and slide over it and then hope you are with in tolerance.
Even on videos they show you see how dangerous it is. For me this is to much of a risk. ( I know this , first tool we made was like this 15 years ago )
If you want to have something precise as a tool to remove heads you must base it on something that has been milled. This can be used as ground 0. All dimensions are measured from one point.
Referent point. Platters and heads stand in precise location, housing can "float" around them. Open one drive and spin platters you will see how platters have azimuth. They "float" if you look and compare to hdd chassis. But if compared to heads they spin just fine
Second is tip of the tool, totally wrong design. You can not slid under heads with triangular design. You must use tangential radius to lift them gentle.
Third problem is balance. If you menage to slide them and get them in nice there is no firm grip that keeps position of heads and tools. Instead of you have one big leaver that can be potential hazard
if moved a bit or just touched a bit or hit in hdd chassis .
There is few more but this should be good enough.
My idea was not to explain how our tools are good and others are bad. I am saying what i see wrong in design of these tools.
They took names , labels , composition supported model list etc etc... but tool is not good enough in my data recovery office. Our clients took to much off a risk when they did not make a backup,
i do not want to risk more of making their drives bad by bad tool. It would be safer to use papers or rubbers hoses then such bad tool design.
Even copy of our tools are better to be used then this particular type.
July 2nd, 2018, 8:03
July 2nd, 2018, 17:40
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.