MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Switch to mobile style


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 27th, 2009, 18:14 
Offline

Joined: February 4th, 2009, 14:40
Posts: 64
Location: Georgia
Are the terminal port settings the same for Samsung as they are for Seagate.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 27th, 2009, 18:16 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
Sometimes.

Vague question = vague answer

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 27th, 2009, 18:22 
Offline

Joined: February 4th, 2009, 14:40
Posts: 64
Location: Georgia
sorry to be vague
I am using the same settings I use for Seagate terminal on Samsung and I am just getting junk displayed. Is the baud rate, data bits, parity, stop bits and flow-controll the same?


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 27th, 2009, 18:55 
Offline

Joined: August 12th, 2008, 13:11
Posts: 3235
Location: USA
Sounds like in that case the answer is no.

There are some Samsung drives that have the same settings as some Seagate drives but I would say that the majority of them are different.

Also check your PM.

_________________
You don't have to backup all of your files, just the ones you want to keep.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 28th, 2009, 10:51 
Offline

Joined: February 4th, 2009, 14:40
Posts: 64
Location: Georgia
Does anyone diagnose what the problem is with this drive from this terminal report.
Samsung HD501LJ. When drive is powered up, it sounds like it is initializing properly and it comes ready in the proper amount of time. The problem is that as soon as I try to detect the drive it goes busy forever.

Thanks

SPW 0000 NoLk
ADC: 0005
SpnOk
spd: 0000 0000 FFFF
H: +00000
ADC: 0006
DAC: 8088
Unlatch Tk: 000173FB

Unlatch Done
ENG>SRV>
SvoTbl Loaded
BD

0003
0004
0005
0003
0004
0006
0005
0001
0002
0003
0004
0007
0003
0004
0005
0004

0003
0001ENG>


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 30th, 2009, 8:24 
Offline

Joined: November 9th, 2006, 15:15
Posts: 2984
I have a very similar problem, my terminal looks like:

SPW 1.5G LinkOk! ADC: 0003
SpnOk
spd: 0000 0000 0000
H: +00000
ADC: 0004
DAC: 7C8B
Unlatch Tk: 00017967

Unlatch Done
ENG>SRV>
SvoTbl Loaded
BD

7FFF
0002
0004
0004
0004
0004
0006
0003
0005
0008
0004
0006
0002
0002
0003
0004
0004
00040401_0000_0000 ENG>


I am looking into this now, next step is HotSwap, I will post here any results.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 30th, 2009, 8:32 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: October 14th, 2005, 9:26
Posts: 1060
Hi :mrgreen:

I find that it must be problem with platter, this not to obtain to read… :idea:

I wait to have helped! :mrgreen:

_________________
Нет ничего невозможного


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 30th, 2009, 8:54 
Offline

Joined: November 29th, 2006, 10:08
Posts: 7864
Location: UK
Is this the original PCB for sure?

_________________
PC Image Data Recovery
http://www.pcimage.co.uk

New!! HDD-PCB.COM for all your PCB and donor HDD requirements!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 30th, 2009, 9:28 
Offline

Joined: March 19th, 2009, 5:30
Posts: 9
Location: United States
"Detect baud rate" command solved the most problems I had with my terminal


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: Seagate vs Samsung
PostPosted: March 30th, 2009, 10:25 
Offline

Joined: November 9th, 2006, 15:15
Posts: 2984
I performed HotSwap and could read all SA modules, I have written appropriate modules to my donor, and data is now accessible after a second hotswap, but disk clicks on access to some areas so I am now creating an image using head map. Seems to be going OK. Looks as though 1 head may be damaged, maybe the service head?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 57 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group