maximus wrote:
AntonioX wrote:
Slightly better... in HDDsuperclone sometimes reads at 24Kb/s and sometimes goes for few minutes at 2Mb/s!
That speed difference could be one head reading very very badly, and another reading only just badly. I could potentially provide more information with the progress log from HDDSuperClone. But with the information given so far, this is not likely to be a good recovery without professional recovery.
Thanks Maximus, I'll post the log of hddsupeclone tomorrow so you can have a look

fzabkar wrote:
I have written a ZOC script for automatically sending the "F" commands:
http://www.hddoracle.com/viewtopic.php?f=113&t=1867Thansk Fzabkar, I've already sent these (some are not in my F list so returns a Invalid dialog message).
I've found in other forums the following commands that may help to speed up the reading, do you know what they do and it would be safe to give it a try?:
F"OFFLINE_SPARING_ENABLED",0,22
F"BGMS_ENABLE",0,22
F"BGMS_PRESCAN",0,22
F"IRAW_ENABLE",0,22
F"ENABLE_EARLY_RECOVERY",1,22
F"VE_ENABLE_EARLY_RECOVERY",1,22
F"OFFLINE_SEEK_AWAY",0,22
F"MULTIPLICATION_FACTOR",0,22
F"AutomaticTraceSaveFlags",0,22
F"GlobalTraceTriggerFlags",0,22
F"PowerFlags",0,22
F"SCTInterval",0100,22
F"BGMSECCTLevel",ff,22
F"BGMSBusIdleIn100ms",1,22
F"IRAWDelayInMilliSecs",1,22
F"DOSMaxRetryCount",1,22
F"SCTTimerReadDefault",0100,22
F"SCTTimerWriteDefault",0100,22
F ”SMART_SUPPORTED”, 0,22
F ”READ_LOOKAHEAD_ENABLED”, 0,22
F "SMART_ENABLED", 0,22
F "SMART_SELF_TEST_SUPPORTED", 0,22
F"RWRecoveryFlags",01,22
F"ReadRetries",00,22
I've attached a log of my original F list...