MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Switch to mobile style


Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Recover data from a LLF disk
PostPosted: November 14th, 2006, 9:22 
Offline

Joined: November 14th, 2006, 9:17
Posts: 1
Hello. I accidently write zeroes on my wd800. The main hdd. I didn't back-up it for long time ago... how can i recover the data? Is there any chance? Any software?
Thanks..


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 14th, 2006, 9:47 
Offline

Joined: October 7th, 2005, 2:03
Posts: 152
Location: serbia
NO any chance........


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 16th, 2006, 12:43 
Offline

Joined: June 27th, 2006, 11:33
Posts: 2288
Location: In ur HDD !
Did u write the hdd with zeros the whole media meaning 100% . If yes not possible . if no there is a possibility .


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 16th, 2006, 12:56 
Offline

Joined: November 9th, 2006, 15:15
Posts: 2984
If you have filled the disk with zeros then your data is overwritten and does not exist on the disk anymore.

Not even the experts can help you here :(


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 17th, 2006, 14:42 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
Well, there are people out there who can recover data from a single LLF.
This is why DOD std. is LLF x 3. But there is no software that will do this for you. This is done with Magnetic force microscopy! But this is very expensive and unless your data is worth several hundred thousand dollars it would not be worth the cost of service. So unfortunately you don't have any realistic options. Sorry. :cry:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 18th, 2006, 8:05 
Offline

Joined: September 27th, 2005, 8:21
Posts: 765
Quote:
Well, there are people out there who can recover data from a single LLF.


This is not true. There are no people who can recover data from a single LLF/ZeroFill.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 18th, 2006, 8:39 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
Maysoft,

what is with Magnetic force microscopy (MFM) and scanning probe microscopy (SPM) techniques???

I have hared that when a 1 is overwritten by 0 it actually is closer to 0.095
and when 0 is overwritten with 1 it actually is 1.05 this can be used to reverse the data. But I believe this is only done by some gov. agencies and by some scientists. But from my research there are some sicentifical papers out there on recovering from LLF and degaussing. The people out there that can perform such things are not necessary DR Engineers.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 18th, 2006, 8:56 
Offline

Joined: September 27th, 2005, 8:21
Posts: 765
Well, there is no way of getting usable data with just MFM. First, these MFM scopes work slow as hell. Second, you then have to somehow imterpret what you've got (well, that is actually doable). There are just so many factors that make this nearly impossible... I am not saying it is impossible at all, but the amount of time&resources needed to accompish that is well beyond the current technical possibilities.

Actually, recovering from degaussing is much easier than from a LLF/Zerofill. :wink:

By the way, who are "those people"? (Hint: government does not use anything like you've mentioned to recover data)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 18th, 2006, 9:28 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
Maysoft,

I agree, it would take a very long time and allot of resources to do.
My point was just that it is possible but not feasible :)

If I remember correctly some scientists from Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) have done research on this. Also Peter Gutman has written a paper called
Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory.
which makes references to IEEE and quantum. I am not sure how valid his paper has, some agreed and some criticized it. You are right, most government agencies don't have much of anything as far as Technology goes and actually lag far behind. But there is one agency which has always been way ahead of the game. But of course I can't prove this because that information is highly classified and not available to us. :cry:

But when It all comes down to the facts, I am just a newb.
So Im sure that your understanding of this is much greater then mine :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 18th, 2006, 12:59 
Offline

Joined: October 1st, 2005, 15:17
Posts: 32
It's easier said than done...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 0:33 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
quasimodo wrote:
If I remember correctly some scientists from Georgia Tech Research Institute (GTRI) have done research on this. Also Peter Gutman has written a paper called
Secure Deletion of Data from Magnetic and Solid-State Memory.

This is just a bullshit (commercial) for selling "magic programs for wiping information"


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 0:39 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
quasimodo wrote:
I have hared that when a 1 is overwritten by 0 it actually is closer to 0.095
and when 0 is overwritten with 1 it actually is 1.05

It does not matter
because HDD does not use simple binary writing on the platters


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 13:56 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
Quote:
This is just a bullshit (commercial) for selling "magic programs for wiping information"


This may be true, since the research was for a defence contract in regards to jet fighters and if the enemy would be able to retrive data from magnetic media in the jet. :roll: I really don't know!

But then I must ask myself why DOD insists on several rounds of overwriting sectors, if 1 round is more then sufficient?

Quote:
It does not matter
because HDD does not use simple binary writing on the platters


Doomer,
could you please explain to me what HDD uses to write to platter?
I tought It was hex, which in it's raw form is binary.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 21:17 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
quasimodo wrote:
Doomer,
could you please explain to me what HDD uses to write to platter?
I tought It was hex, which in it's raw form is binary.

new HDDs use PRML encoding - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PRML for storing information - this is not a binary information but analog signals


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 21:23 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
quasimodo wrote:
But then I must ask myself why DOD insists on several rounds of overwriting sectors, if 1 round is more then sufficient?

1. most people are stupid, think stereotypes and managable
2. it was very-very-very old standard for wiping information (for floppy and MFM-disks)


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 21:33 
Offline

Joined: September 27th, 2005, 8:21
Posts: 765
Yep, that would definitely make sense for floppies and MFM disks.

Actually several rounds would not be enough since tracks might be shifted - because of mechanical wear and heat deformations. I think the only reliable way of destroying data on a floppy/MFM HDD is to physically destroy it :D


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 19th, 2006, 21:42 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
Doomer,

thanks for the clarification.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 20th, 2006, 3:15 
Offline

Joined: November 1st, 2005, 10:04
Posts: 238
Data can only be stored as positive or negative - 0, 1 - binary... on the disk media.

prml, not a method of storing bits, is a method of intrepretation of the positive or negative - 0,1 - binary.... bits stored on the media.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 20th, 2006, 7:47 
Offline

Joined: October 23rd, 2006, 8:56
Posts: 1336
That's what I thought, since bit can either be on or off.
But now Im confused :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: November 20th, 2006, 9:02 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3577
Location: Chicago
coffeebean wrote:
prml, not a method of storing bits, is a method of intrepretation of the positive or negative - 0,1 - binary.... bits stored on the media.

this is not true
PRML using for saving physical disk space - you can encode 4 bits in one analog signal of PRML
after you decode PRML - you can get your bits
RTFM


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 21 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2  Next

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 108 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group