Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
May 23rd, 2009, 19:14
A quick observation about CHKDSK on Windows XP
When working with failing drives that are still in situ on Windows XP systems
CHKDSK, if it automatically starts on Windows boot-up, in about 40-50% of cases it will cause some drives to appear as "unformatted" after it has completed scanning the drive...why is this?
May 23rd, 2009, 20:12
1. The drives may have bad sectors, and CHKDSK exacerbates the problem;
2. IMHO, Microsoft doesn't write decent repair utilities. CHKDSK is at best a crap shoot; some drives may be improved; others may be damaged further.
3. If I run CHKDSK, it is never on a failing drive - only on an image. And only with caution. The best idea is to make a copy of the image in case it mucks it up.
Jono
May 23rd, 2009, 20:19
jono-ats wrote: CHKDSK is at best a crap shoot; some drives may be improved; others may be damaged further.
Exactly.
May 24th, 2009, 2:09
If drive is ok physically - I mean R/W elements, surface, SMART ATT, Chkdsk will fix filesystem issues. Your problem is MISSED INITIAL DIAGNOSE.
May 24th, 2009, 13:48
BlackST wrote:If drive is ok physically - I mean R/W elements, surface, SMART ATT, Chkdsk will fix filesystem issues. Your problem is MISSED INITIAL DIAGNOSE.
Blackst, so chkdsk will only damage drives that are physically failing?
May 24th, 2009, 14:06
Anything that writes to a failing drive is bad. (See Spinrite, HDD Regenerator, defragmenting, etc)
May 24th, 2009, 14:55
Ditto.
May 24th, 2009, 16:13
CHKDSK only cares about the file system being healthy, it doesn't care about data and it may reallocate data or even truncate the Master File Table if it needs to (thus making a lot of data unavailable via the OS).
May 25th, 2009, 8:55
http://www.kellys-korner-xp.com/xp_tweaks.htm82. Disable or Enable Check Disk Upon Boot
Had to search for it, who knows it may help others from causing further hdd damage with CHKDSK.
May 25th, 2009, 9:32
You can always abandon CHKDSK / SCANDISK execution at atartup when prompted. What's worst ? work on damaged / unstable filesystem or make CHKDSK / SCANDISK make some more damage ?
May 25th, 2009, 10:00
Its the countdown i think for some thats the problem. That screen when it appears initiated before many people ahve had the chance to read it or decide.
Maybe then is a need for a longer countdown, anybody a registry fix for that. Set for 2mins or indefinate should give people time to read and decide. Anyone have a registry fix so people can use that instead.
May 25th, 2009, 10:18
The problem is not the countdown :
1) If CHKDSK / SCANDISK has triggered only because NTFS has not been flushed, it's no problem, but you still don't know.
2) If there are serious problems, would you allow the OS to continue loading normally and eventually make more damage to FS ?
3) If there are serious problems, what else can you do when you see the countdown ? Switch off ?
May 25th, 2009, 11:39
counted already... need to check RAW on image n several header including partial data lost.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.