@vormov:
vormov wrote:I was able to get into the folder i needed using winhex.
You don't say if you were using the original USB-SATA bridge to do that, or not.
Based on the data pattern in LBA 0 then, as
pcimage and
jono-ats pointed out, the original enclosure seems to be one that uses an "Initio" chip to encrypt data - however the all-zeros pattern that you seem to be showing immediately
after LBA 0 (i.e. LBA 1), is not normal for an encrypted drive, when it is being accessed without the correct USB-SATA bridge.
So in short, I see conflicting evidence. I suspect that there is something in the history of this situation that will help it make sense, but we haven't heard the full story yet...
vormov wrote:I was also able to recover a bunch of txt documents that I wanted.
So is that it - are you finsihed and we can close the thread?
If not, then I suggest for all the readers of the thread, you need to very clearly explain, in chronological order, what happened originally, what you did (testing, any h/w & s/w changes, reformatting etc.), up to now.
vormov wrote:The HD didn't work when connected to the enclosure either.
I suspect there were/are 2 problems: (a) Something happened (which you need to explain to us) which caused you to start this recovery attempt in the first place. That fault/problem/whatever hasn't been solved, and could be causing
some of the problems that you're still seeing - hence your comment above. (b) You've then unknowingly added to the problem, by not using the original USB-SATA bridge board.
Therefore, if you need more help from the readers of the thread - give us the
full story from the beginning, please.

Also, be aware that if there is, as I suspect, an underlying problem that you haven't yet mentioned which occurred at the beginning of the story, then you could be using the valuable last minutes of the drive, in your recovery attempts...