Switch to full style
Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
Post a reply

7200.12

June 13th, 2011, 15:59

Hi to all!! :mrgreen:

Terminal
Rst 0x20M

clicking drive
Is firmware CC35
ST31000528AS

BAD HEAD? or fw is corrupted? :shock:
:?:
Help..

Re: 7200.12

June 13th, 2011, 16:46

I vote for heads. The only model I've seen with FW issues & Clicking is the 333AS

Re: 7200.12

June 14th, 2011, 11:54

Those ones normally it's heads.

Re: 7200.12

June 14th, 2011, 21:03

How to Test Seagate Drives' Heads for HDD Repair:
http://www.datarecoverytools.co.uk/2011 ... dd-repair/

Re: 7200.12

June 14th, 2011, 23:39

fzabkar wrote:How to Test Seagate Drives' Heads for HDD Repair:
http://www.datarecoverytools.co.uk/2011 ... dd-repair/

That's rather bad advice

1. This information related to ST10 Seagate drives. 7200.12 is not an ST10 drive
2. T4 test recalcs adaptives, so if you need data from a drive you shouldn't ever run this. This article clearly states REPAIR not data recovery but inexperienced user will not understand the difference until it's too late

This article will bring more harm than good
I suggest you never mention this link in your posts

Re: 7200.12

June 15th, 2011, 3:49

fzabkar wrote:How to Test Seagate Drives' Heads for HDD Repair:
http://www.datarecoverytools.co.uk/2011 ... dd-repair/


Perfect idea for killing data on live drive ! :mrgreen:

Re: 7200.12

June 15th, 2011, 4:50

BlackST wrote:
fzabkar wrote:How to Test Seagate Drives' Heads for HDD Repair:
http://www.datarecoverytools.co.uk/2011 ... dd-repair/


Perfect idea for killing data on live drive ! :mrgreen:

I have posted the above URL on several occasions, so there have been plenty of opportunities to point out its potential for killing data on live drives, assuming that's correct. I even explicitly asked the data recovery community to confirm whether the procedure was safe, but noone did so ... until now.

BTW, thanks to Doomer for eventually setting me straight ... really.

Re: 7200.12

June 15th, 2011, 5:31

fzabkar wrote:I have posted the above URL on several occasions, so there have been plenty of opportunities to point out its potential for killing data on live drives, assuming that's correct. I even explicitly asked the data recovery community to confirm whether the procedure was safe, but noone did so ... until now.


When procedures are unchecked, unsafe or UNKNOWN would be better NOT to point in that direction.
Anyway someone will decide if it is necessary to cleanup this thread too for the sake of users that are redirected here by google or other way.

Re: 7200.12

June 16th, 2011, 3:05

I am quite happy for this thread to remain exactly as it is. I don't have any problems with anything that I have written. My conscience is clear.

Re: 7200.12

June 16th, 2011, 3:27

We too :mrgreen: .
Post a reply