June 23rd, 2011, 11:39
June 23rd, 2011, 11:49
June 23rd, 2011, 11:53
June 23rd, 2011, 12:41
June 23rd, 2011, 12:52
computerexpert wrote:I could justify a few hundred dollars investing in a solution that *may* recover some data. Can't justify a few thousand.
June 23rd, 2011, 13:44
drc wrote:computerexpert wrote:I could justify a few hundred dollars investing in a solution that *may* recover some data. Can't justify a few thousand.
Not gonna happen, IMO.
You can read through the old threads in the forum and get some ideas of the very few things that can be reasonably DIY-able (PCB repair/replacement being the main thing) and if you are handy with software or programming you could come up with a cheap or free imaging solution for the easy drives, but there is not anything out there that is going to deal with firmware or mechanical problems for a couple hundred bucks. Additionally, none of the tools are going to teach you how to use them and what to do, regardless of how much you spend.
June 23rd, 2011, 14:53
One way to bring the cost of data recovery down is to make it more accessible.
June 23rd, 2011, 16:04
June 23rd, 2011, 16:39
June 25th, 2011, 8:17
computerexpert wrote:Short history: I've been working with hard drive for about 35 years, replace heads & platters in Control Data (CDC) drives back in the 80's ...
June 25th, 2011, 14:19
fzabkar wrote:Same here. In those days we were taught how to do this kind of work in a matter of days, without any prerequisite knowledge. The required tools for a head alignment were a 10K disc exerciser, a $3K CE pack, a torque screwdriver, and an alignment tool that looked like a key-shaped sardine can opener with an eccentric nipple.
June 25th, 2011, 15:23
June 25th, 2011, 16:58
computerexpert wrote:I got my quote on the PC-3K, price almost $10K, a bit more than what I'm looking to invest. Perhaps if I was 20 years younger... I don't mind investing in hardware, if I can see a payback down the road. My network analyzers, cable certifies, scopes, all payed for themselves, from a couple jobs to a couple years. I can't see a payback any time soon on the PC-3K, and considering it will only solve less than 50% of the drive failures (perhaps a lot less than 50%).
I have been getting quotes to recover my customer's drive. And even explaining that I believe it's a firmware rebuild job, and to limit it to that, I still get quotes $800 or more.
Now, one thing bothers me: most recovery services will look at the drive for free and tell you what is recoverable, and give you a quote. To "look at the drive" they pretty much have to make the drive readable, essentially recovering the drive (at least temporarily) to "see" you data. Easy process if you have the right equipment?Obviously, the major cost of recovery is their investment in equipment. I predict a niche market between the "Do it Big" and "Do it Small", forming that will steal the easy, profitable jobs away from the "big" guys. Seen it happen in the computer industry many times.
Just some thoughts, sorry to ramble...
BTW: Can anyone relate their experience with Salvation Data's products?
June 25th, 2011, 19:09
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.