Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
March 4th, 2013, 5:56
Hi,
I've got a problem with my HDD:
Model: WD5000AAKS-00V1A0
Date: 14 FEB 2010
DCM: HHRCNTJCHN
DCX: 3009V2417
Made: In Thailand
PCB Marking: 2060-701640-002 REV A
PCB Sticker: 2061-701640-K02 05PD6 XF A160 QU2E 8 0002320 0322
It spins up and then you hear some clicking. Next it spins down and restarts again.
I bought a new HDD with nearly the same PCB:
Model: WD5000AAKS-00V1A0
Date: 12 FEB 2010
DCM: HHNCHTJCH
PCB Marking: 2060-701640-002 REV A
PCB Sticker: 2061-701640-202 04PD4 XW 8R44 0RXG 3 0001320 0321
I moved the SPI-Flash U12 to the new PCB and put the new PCB to the old HDD but it doesn't make any sounds. So I moved the SPI-Flash and PCB back and it works like before.
Do I have to change another IC? What could be the problem?
Thank you for replys
March 4th, 2013, 6:25
drd wrote:It spins up and then you hear some clicking. Next it spins down and restarts again.
You wasted money on a new PCB, the problem is very likely elsewhere, from what I see.
Before you ask : either you buy expensive tools and hope someone will teach you how to use it (not a good idea for repairing your single drive) or either you learn how to use it, or get professional service. Plan B : forget data and carry on.
March 4th, 2013, 7:21
I'm studying computer science and therefore I'm intereseted in this topic.
What could be wrong? And which tools do you mean (hardware or software tools)?
March 4th, 2013, 8:11
Sorry I give up !
March 4th, 2013, 8:30
I'm sorry, too.
I think the heads are stucked.
But I'm wondering about the fact, the new PCB won't work with the defective HDD even though the Flash was changed. Do you have any idea about this phenomenon?
March 4th, 2013, 9:17
Translation of BlackST's post above: "this damage is not DIY, regardless if you're studying computer science, rocket science or whatever.
It needs a lot of know how, expensive equipment and tons of experience."
March 4th, 2013, 12:24
drd wrote:I'm studying computer science and therefore I'm intereseted in this topic.
What could be wrong? And which tools do you mean (hardware or software tools)?
You are suddenly interested in this topic only because your disk blew up. Harsh, but true.
March 4th, 2013, 12:38
It's not even my disk.
I read a lot about that earlier but it wasn't that important for me. Now, I've got a reason to spend more time for that topic. Until now, I was always able to recover data by ddrescue. But now it's worse.
I suppose you are right. But nevertheless it's interesting. To get the data from the spi-flash, I programmed a snippet in c on my raspberry pi to have a backup.
Do anyone have a explanation for the problem with the changed PCB. I thought it should work, at least try to spin up.
March 4th, 2013, 17:27
drd wrote:It's not even my disk.
I had a feeling about it...
drd wrote:I read a lot about that earlier but it wasn't that important for me. Now, I've got a reason to spend more time for that topic.
Usually the reason is because DR is known to be the chicken that lays golden eggs - but it's not so poetic so let's assume in this case the reason is another one

Anyway, jokes apart, understanding these puppies may be SO FRUSTRATING....
drd wrote:Until now, I was always able to recover data by ddrescue. But now it's worse.
Exactly, when there is actually no failure DDrescue and co. work perfectly. But as you said, now it's worse.

drd wrote:Do anyone have a explanation for the problem with the changed PCB. I thought it should work, at least try to spin up.
To explain, we should see and test the PCBs AND ROMs (both!) LIVE.
March 5th, 2013, 14:23
I will upload the photos and recorded sound on thursday.
I soldered the EEprom in the correct way, but I could test it again. Should I record communication with a logic-analyzer?
I recognized different assembly (2 Resistors near pads to HDD) from the two PCB's.
March 5th, 2013, 15:26
my
wd clickingread- Code:
Western Digital a dead preamplifier is also detected by the specific sounds: after TWO loud clicks the drive will stop the spindle
mine repeats the upper sequence about 5 times in 30secs because ata standards specs a 30 sec delay at some moment.
does the donor pcb with the old rom chip...work on the donor hdd?
March 5th, 2013, 15:52
drd wrote:I will upload the photos and recorded sound on thursday.
I soldered the EEprom in the correct way, but I could test it again. Should I record communication with a logic-analyzer?
I recognized different assembly (2 Resistors near pads to HDD) from the two PCB's.
Is it possible your donor pcb had no eeprom ?
If so those two resistors config the pcb to use internal rom and not the external.
Changing the rom wont work in this case.
Dobre
March 5th, 2013, 16:05
+1
You beat me to it!

That is certainly one explanation why the "new" PCB doesn't fix anything with the "old" EEPROM attached. Or the new PCB is itself faulty..
March 5th, 2013, 17:07
dobrevjetser wrote:drd wrote:I will upload the photos and recorded sound on thursday.
I soldered the EEprom in the correct way, but I could test it again. Should I record communication with a logic-analyzer?
I recognized different assembly (2 Resistors near pads to HDD) from the two PCB's.
Is it possible your donor pcb had no eeprom ?
If so those two resistors config the pcb to use internal rom and not the external.
Changing the rom wont work in this case.
Dobre
March 7th, 2013, 11:01
Hi again,
My new PCB has got an EEprom and it's working fine with it's own HDD.
I'm sorry for bad soldering on new PCB. I ripped off one pad, so I had to short two pins of the EEprom.
I attached some photos and the noise from the old HDD.
Difference in assembly:
Pictures New_PCB_Top_02.jpg and OLD_PCB_Top_04.jpg:
Near Pads J1 - R71, R51, R48, R68 and C48, R50
Maybe more differences.
- Attachments
-
- Defective_HDD.zip
- Noise and photos from defective HDD
- (12.28 MiB) Downloaded 440 times
March 7th, 2013, 16:01
Hi,
the shorted pins are connected on PCB - that's why I shorted them.
Both EEproms are still working. I desoldered them with hot-air-Station. After that, I removed the solder with desoldering wick. Unfortunately, I used a wrong soldering tip and that's the reason for the ripped pad and dark stain. Next, I soldered them both (old and new one) with a flux pen. That's why you can't read the label.
Please have a look on the old PCB. It looks better. I know, the EEprom you mentioned is soldered in a bad way.
March 7th, 2013, 16:05
We know the situation is getting worse. What is going to be done about it?
March 7th, 2013, 16:06
Thanks for the answer.
But why does the new PCB don't start with old EEprom (imagine EEprom is ok)?
March 7th, 2013, 16:09
Spildit wrote:I think the heads are stucked.
Judging by the recorded sound, heads are not stuck at all.
It's not even my disk.
Cool .....
I'm sorry for bad soldering on new PCB.
Tell that to the owner of the drive instead .....
God..dammnned! You're just making someone else's repair bill go 2x higher.
March 7th, 2013, 16:13
drd wrote:Hi,
the shorted pins are connected on PCB - that's why I shorted them.
Both EEproms are still working. I desoldered them with hot-air-Station. After that, I removed the solder with desoldering wick. Unfortunately, I used a wrong soldering tip and that's the reason for the ripped pad and dark stain. Next, I soldered them both (old and new one) with a flux pen. That's why you can't read the label.
Please have a look on the old PCB. It looks better. I know, the EEprom you mentioned is soldered in a bad way.
How it "looks" inside the by-now-overheated chip is more important. Did you not work quickly enough? Use too much heat too long? Not use a shield over the chip, thus heating the body too? Why are you experimenting on someone else' critical work?
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.