June 7th, 2013, 6:06
June 7th, 2013, 6:44
June 7th, 2013, 7:12
June 7th, 2013, 8:50
June 7th, 2013, 10:27
June 7th, 2013, 10:56
Eudorcas wrote:1.4 million hours MTBF (160 Years?!) and it died after 2.3 Years of service runtime (SMART Info).
June 7th, 2013, 10:59
June 7th, 2013, 11:30
June 7th, 2013, 21:14
Vulcan wrote:Eudorcas wrote:1.4 million hours MTBF (160 Years?!) and it died after 2.3 Years of service runtime (SMART Info).
By making that comparison, this shows you are misunderstanding the meaning of MTBF - there is no relationship between MTBF and service life. Research on Google (e.g. mtbf vs service life) and you will find plenty of articles. Hope those will help to explain why you should never make that comparison.
There are some other points above where I don't agree with your conclusions based on the data you provide, but since this is not a critical situation and further explanation is not important, I will just wish you good luck with the drive.
lcoughey wrote:You have too much time on your hands to make a failing drive look like it is healthy. At the end of the day, the drive is going to get worse and any future data stored on the drive will be lost.
Doomer wrote:5 years for a drive is very successful life
I'd say even 2 years is very successful
And I mean calendar years, not the run time years
June 8th, 2013, 0:01
Eudorcas wrote:It could've been longer If I did install a UPS and didn't install that dang Diskeeper with real-time defrag. With those 5 years of service it encountered countless blackouts while I'm encoding/working After Effects stuff.
June 8th, 2013, 3:07
June 8th, 2013, 7:01
June 8th, 2013, 7:46
November 7th, 2025, 20:11
BlackST wrote:Just one warning : beware of any "hdd regenerating" / "exerciser" software , they are ineffective, and also of anything that deals with "internals" (*cough!*) - you will turn your drive into a hi-tech paperweight or doorstop.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.