August 5th, 2013, 19:02
August 5th, 2013, 21:31
August 5th, 2013, 21:49
August 5th, 2013, 21:58
August 5th, 2013, 22:02
August 6th, 2013, 5:59
August 6th, 2013, 7:41
August 6th, 2013, 7:50
digitalferret wrote:Should be mandatory reading for IT techs that fancy battering drives for hours with Spinrite
August 6th, 2013, 8:34
August 6th, 2013, 13:34
August 6th, 2013, 16:02
digitalferret wrote:The other analogy i like is the head v platter one.
Went something like
The head moving across the platter can be likened to a fast jet doing Mach4, a centimeter off the ground, counting blades of grass as it goes :)
__.
/ / - - --
/ /é
./ /é /--ù ð ð ðð
/ðÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ/ ³
{ ®®® øøøøøøøøøøøøøøø ®®³
\ÄÄÄÄÄÄ\ÄÄÄÄ\ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ/
ùé\ \
é\ \
\_\. = = ==
ÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁÁÁÁÁÁ�ÁÁÁAugust 6th, 2013, 16:05
Vulcan wrote:digitalferret wrote:Should be mandatory reading for IT techs that fancy battering drives for hours with Spinrite
Agreed!
Vulcan wrote:<rant> As I see it, the problem we have is that just occasionally, the repeated reading from Spinrite will "work" to make an unreadable sector become readable again (even though other approaches would also have worked better and been less risky!), so using that high-risk utility is seen as "good" by some, and those occasional successes prevent anyone from saying that it never works, so it's folklore continues. :( What users neglect to mention are the times when it makes a situation much worse, or totally unrecoverable, because they may not realise that the drive wasn't unrecoverable to begin with - it was Spinrite (or HDDRegenerator etc.) which made it that way! *sigh* </rant>
August 6th, 2013, 16:41
digitalferret wrote:The other analogy i like is the head v platter one.
August 7th, 2013, 11:34
August 9th, 2013, 3:19
August 19th, 2013, 4:22
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.