January 3rd, 2015, 4:59
January 3rd, 2015, 5:10
January 3rd, 2015, 11:47
January 3rd, 2015, 15:02
saltwater wrote:Yes, compatible.
January 3rd, 2015, 17:11
January 3rd, 2015, 17:25
pcimage wrote:saltwater wrote:Yes, compatible.
Are you sure? I've found these are a little fussy regarding DCM.
January 3rd, 2015, 17:33
shahij wrote:The patient was dropped on the floor. No abnormal noise. Very little grr. Sometime.
Patient - July 2013
Donor - Nov 2014
In exchange of heads-
Drive IDs, but no access to SA.
No access to data area.
In reverse, similar symptoms.
So, the heads were compatible.
Any thought regarding the case?
January 3rd, 2015, 17:58
So, the heads were compatible.
January 4th, 2015, 4:39
January 4th, 2015, 7:10
Tomset wrote:shahij,So, the heads were compatible.
As long as you do not compare DIT patient and donor, it can not be argued.
Besides remain adaptive parameters heads which can be very different.
Nor any information about the DIT and adaptive prametrah on labels HDD not.
The newer the HDD, the more difficult to pick up a donor.
You can find several dozen donors with the same DIT, but no one will not work.
Hot swap method also does not work well on them.
DCM indicates only the vendors, but their parameters.
On older disks, selection for DCМ worked, because there were few components with different parameters.
On new disks oriented with at DCМ there is not any sense.
January 4th, 2015, 9:58
January 4th, 2015, 10:19
January 4th, 2015, 10:34
and DCM helped (matching one particular digit).
January 4th, 2015, 16:14
saltwater wrote:Yes, compatible.
January 5th, 2015, 4:48
January 5th, 2015, 4:52
January 5th, 2015, 8:36
Assume you can generate DIT from the DONOR, but how can generate the DIT from PATIENT?
January 5th, 2015, 8:57
January 5th, 2015, 9:57
January 6th, 2015, 5:04
shahij wrote:In kernel mode, you can access to ROM. It means the DIT is contained into the ROM or MOD47.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.