March 8th, 2015, 22:34
March 9th, 2015, 20:25
March 10th, 2015, 2:34
March 10th, 2015, 2:47
jerovsek wrote:in any case,you will need new drive. So why would you borrow drive?
March 10th, 2015, 4:21
You need to have a rethink. A drive image as a file is going to be about the same size as the source imaged drive. Unless of course you have a compressed image which I wouldn't recommend. So you are going to need a good drive of the same or larger size to copy to!huckleberrypie wrote:jerovsek wrote:in any case,you will need new drive. So why would you borrow drive?
So I could shove in some of my files into it as a drive image for the time being and take those that I need from the said image.
March 10th, 2015, 23:09
dick wrote:You need to have a rethink. A drive image as a file is going to be about the same size as the source imaged drive. Unless of course you have a compressed image which I wouldn't recommend. So you are going to need a good drive of the same or larger size to copy to!huckleberrypie wrote:jerovsek wrote:in any case,you will need new drive. So why would you borrow drive?
So I could shove in some of my files into it as a drive image for the time being and take those that I need from the said image.
March 11th, 2015, 9:50
If the data is important to you then you should consider sending the drive to someone doing data recovery at a professional level (not the computer shop) as at this point it shouldn't be an expensive recovery.
March 11th, 2015, 20:19
Spildit wrote:I was thinking more on the lines of going directly to the files that the OP really need and left rest of the drive alone.
If the OP only needs a bunch of files it's saffer to go after them if the partition and file alocation is still fucntional rather then attempting to clone the entire drive and risk killing the heads on the process without reaching the data that is indeed needed.
Demo :
http://www.hddoracle.com/viewtopic.php?f=30&t=1184
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.