Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
March 27th, 2015, 16:45
I would test your file transfers on drive C: rather than D:.
ISTM that you have a bad section between 50GB and 80GB. Try to replicate those results with MHDD under DOS.
March 27th, 2015, 17:05
Wherever I may copy, C or D.. after jumping robustly to about 50 MB/s, the disk i/o suddenly drops down to around 8-10 MB/s.. sometimes even as low as 800-1200 KB/s which makes me wonder which year am I living in.. So any inputs Plz ??
Say in this image here :http://forum.hddguru.com/download/file.php?id=9745&mode=view, what does Interface CRC Error Count is unusually high ?? what exactly is this Interface CRC Error Count.. ??
March 27th, 2015, 17:20
Wherever that I may copy, C or D drive.. After jumping to a robust 50MB/s, the disk i/o suddenly drops to about 10 MB/s.. On occasion I had to withstand even 800-1200 KB/s.. Grrrrrrr.. Yeah tearing my hair out..
In one of the screenshots above, "INTERFACE CRC ERROR COUNT" shows a large deterrioration of about 200 errors.. Exactly what is this "INTERFACE CRC ERROR COUNT" ??
Thanks for ur Input, Guyz..
March 27th, 2015, 17:24
i think we are talking here of some wear and tear... i see you have a lot of slow reading sectors...i have a hdd that also has some slow reading sectors and although the theoretical speed it's 100mb/s it barely goes to 10 and in my case the answer it's wear...and judging by your sectors i would presume the same.
March 27th, 2015, 17:34
Sooooooo...... JUST trash it & get a new one ??
March 28th, 2015, 6:09
not at all, you can keep it for backups, but for everyday use, maybe it's too slow because of the problems it has...but i think as a backup drive will do just fine.
March 28th, 2015, 15:25
nicolae788 wrote:not at all, you can keep it for backups, but for everyday use, maybe it's too slow because of the problems it has...but i think as a backup drive will do just fine.
Thanks Guyzz.. Everybody.. I thought maybe there was a quick_fix..
Guess will just have to grin n bear it..
Thanks again>>
March 28th, 2015, 16:16
The UDMA CRC Error Count reflects SATA interface errors. I wouldn't blame the drive for those.
Windows tools would be affected by interference from background tasks, so a DOS based surface scan would be more reliable. If MHDD confirms the existence of the bad area, I would create 3 partitions and confine the bad area to the middle partition. Then you could use the HDD for non-critical storage.
The following article tries to explain the SMART attributes:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.
April 3rd, 2015, 8:12
cheap stuff thats what is wrong
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.