January 4th, 2016, 9:24
[ 136.461770] ata10: exception Emask 0x10 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x4050000 action 0xe frozen
[ 136.461775] ata10: irq_stat 0x80400040, connection status changed
[ 136.461779] ata10: SError: { PHYRdyChg CommWake DevExch }
[ 136.461785] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 146.453427] ata10: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
[ 146.453432] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 149.311826] ata10: SATA link up 6.0 Gbps (SStatus 133 SControl 300)
[ 149.342248] ata10.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-1E6166, CC45, max UDMA/133
[ 149.342253] ata10.00: 5860533168 sectors, multi 0: LBA48
[ 149.343091] ata10.00: configured for UDMA/133
[ 149.343285] ata10: EH complete
[ 149.343373] scsi 9:0:0:0: Direct-Access ATA ST3000DM001-1E61 CC45 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5
[ 149.343694] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] 5860533168 512-byte logical blocks: (3.00 TB/2.72 TiB)
[ 149.343699] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] 4096-byte physical blocks
[ 149.343894] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off
[ 149.343900] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 00 3a 00 00
[ 149.343985] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA
[ 149.353983] sdb: unknown partition table
[ 149.354454] sd 9:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI disk
[ 157.380625] ata10.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 frozen
[ 157.380632] ata10.00: failed command: SMART
[ 157.380638] ata10.00: cmd b0/d0:01:00:4f:c2/00:00:00:00:00/00 tag 12 pio 512 in
res 40/00:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x4 (timeout)
[ 157.380641] ata10.00: status: { DRDY }
[ 157.380645] ata10: hard resetting link
[ 167.374910] ata10: softreset failed (1st FIS failed)
[ 167.374916] ata10: hard resetting link
Boot 0x40M
Spin Up
Trans.
Spin Up
SpinOK
(P) SATA Reset
(S) SATA Reset
January 8th, 2016, 21:27
January 8th, 2016, 22:51
January 9th, 2016, 6:23
January 9th, 2016, 14:36
LarrySabo wrote:Given their history, I don't know why anyone would want to resurrect a failing DM drive, especially as there is no data recovery required. Just bin it and vow not to buy another Seagate, is my advice.
January 10th, 2016, 6:23
It was an interesting experience, I have learned a lot and finally got all my data back, so was totally worth it. However I will never buy a Seagate device again − this was clearly a software related issue and it was a way too hard to find some good information about this particular devices. Especially if you have no specific data recovery software or hardware.LarrySabo wrote:Given their history, I don't know why anyone would want to resurrect a failing DM drive, especially as there is no data recovery required. Just bin it and vow not to buy another Seagate, is my advice.
This was a really good advice, however at the time of your reply I had already messed up my device by issuing some commands (I am a little bit risky sometimes). In retrospect I think clearing all the SMART data should have been enough, but I also regenerated the translator with the wrong command which does not take the NRG list into account. So I ended up with the partial access error. I had a backup (terminal dump) of the old NRG list but I was unable to find out how to add entries manually. I finally cleared the NRG list with i40,1,22 and regenerated the translator again. After this I was able to access the full device but I got some bad sector errors because all the previous mappings had gone (if I understand this correctly). But it worked and all my "nice to have them back"-files are not damaged.labtech wrote:P.S. Don't try things off the internet without understanding clearly what is going on. Educate yourself first before issuing commands in the terminal.
January 10th, 2016, 21:12
koehlma wrote:This was a really good advice, however at the time of your reply I had already messed up my device by issuing some commands (I am a little bit risky sometimes)...labtech wrote:P.S. Don't try things off the internet without understanding clearly what is going on. Educate yourself first before issuing commands in the terminal.
January 10th, 2016, 21:36
koehlma wrote:However I will never buy a Seagate device again
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.