Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
March 27th, 2016, 10:59
Hi,
I use to get 2T HDD to run my PCs whether Win 7 or XP I don worry about the size issue. Lately I bought a 3T HDD for my NAS. Thinking I have much capacity to use but after the NAS formatted the HDD, it only has 2.7T. I lost almost 290G of capacity.

I wonder if I divide 2 partitions of each 1.5T, I shall have a lesser lost of capacity. Is it true? Or I expected too much?
March 27th, 2016, 13:20
This is how manufactures calculate:
3 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 x 1000 = 3 000 000 000 000 bytes = 3,00 TB when you use 1000 as a multiplier
This is how the operating system calculates ( to use 1024 as a multipier or in that case as a divider):
3 000 000 000 000 bytes / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 / 1024 = 2,72 TB
This is the closest explanation I can give you out of my mind.
edit: Nothing wrong with your drive. Only two different viewpoints of calculating. In my opinion somehow a marketing trick. Isn't it that way?
March 27th, 2016, 13:30
Here a good explanation:
Not that I wanted to give any recommendations for Seagate Drives...
http://knowledge.seagate.com/articles/en_US/FAQ/172191en
March 28th, 2016, 10:28
Dear all,
Ya.. indeed the manufacturers' own term. So I just want to know if I divide the 3T HDD in to 1.5T x 2, will it has the lesser lost of the capacity? Does this theory work?
March 28th, 2016, 10:45
3 TB / 2 = 1.5 TB (Terabyte) = 1.364 TiB (Tebibyte)
March 29th, 2016, 3:05
So there is really has no advantage if I divided the 3T to 2 section of 1.5T, I still lost almost the same capacity that I lost in a single drive.
March 29th, 2016, 7:44
you don't get it I suppose, you don't lose anything because it wasn't there in the first place
The size of your HDD is 3TB and not 3TiB (never was and never be 3TiB)
March 29th, 2016, 17:29
whomiask wrote:So there is really has no advantage if I divided the 3T to 2 section of 1.5T, I still lost almost the same capacity that I lost in a single drive. :shock:
Is 1 kilometre equal to 1000 metres or 1024 metres?
March 29th, 2016, 17:56
fzabkar wrote:Is 1 kilometre equal to 1000 metres or 1024 metres?

:like:
March 30th, 2016, 1:23

Ya.. Just don like the "lost" of it, it's equal I paid more $$ but don get what I want..
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.