Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
March 8th, 2018, 13:58
What's the drive condition?
I think that someone (another DR firm ) had struggling with the drive and put that sticker on after failed attempts?
March 8th, 2018, 14:43
I have not opened the dive yet, but this label is exactly the same material and color as the Seagate mobile original. I would be amazed if its been made by a DR company. Its too precise. I will let you know as I find out more.
March 8th, 2018, 14:48
I’d say someone has removed the white label, leaving the foil one. IMHO
March 8th, 2018, 14:48
ddrecovery wrote:I would be amazed if its been made by a DR company. Its too precise.
It would be very very precise indeed.
March 8th, 2018, 14:50
The top cover sticker does look somewhat thin, exposing the contour of the magnets and such.
March 8th, 2018, 15:00
original:
http://www.nix.ru/autocatalog/notebook_ ... llery=2245They took off the sticker with the text.
On the lugs of the lid there were traces of scotch.
So do when the client disk is lost.
March 8th, 2018, 15:03
pcimage wrote:I’d say someone has removed the white label, leaving the foil one. IMHO
You are indeed correct Sean. I thought the white and silver labels were one label, but as you say they are not. I can also see glue marks where the white portion has been removed. I would send my apologies for accusing Seagate, but cant bring myself too
Thanks everyone.
March 8th, 2018, 15:03
pcimage wrote:I’d say someone has removed the white label, leaving the foil one. IMHO
+1
March 8th, 2018, 15:10
Plot thickens. This came from an IT partner to us. Just asked him if he removed the label and said he didn't. In fact he said it was the second one without a label he had seen in the last few weeks.
March 8th, 2018, 15:32
ddrecovery wrote:Plot thickens. This came from an IT partner to us. Just asked him if he removed the label and said he didn't. In fact he said it was the second one without a label he had seen in the last few weeks.
Call me cynical but in cases like these, and opened drives that the client denies all knowledge of, we assume the client is lying until proven otherwise.
In more than 9/10 times it turns out they are lying.
March 8th, 2018, 15:37
pcimage wrote:ddrecovery wrote:Plot thickens. This came from an IT partner to us. Just asked him if he removed the label and said he didn't. In fact he said it was the second one without a label he had seen in the last few weeks.
Call me cynical but in cases like these, and opened drives that the client denies all knowledge of, we assume the client is lying until proven otherwise.
In more than 9/10 times it turns out they are lying.

You are of course correct, but this guy does do basic data recovery (DDI) but does not have a cleanroom, so he is normally pretty trustworthy. After all we Data Recovery engineers can all be trusted.......
March 8th, 2018, 15:43
pcimage wrote:ddrecovery wrote:Plot thickens. This came from an IT partner to us. Just asked him if he removed the label and said he didn't. In fact he said it was the second one without a label he had seen in the last few weeks.
Call me cynical but in cases like these, and opened drives that the client denies all knowledge of, we assume the client is lying until proven otherwise.
In more than 9/10 times it turns out they are lying.

+1 exactly
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.