March 4th, 2019, 16:17
March 4th, 2019, 17:36
March 4th, 2019, 18:15
What do you see that is troubling you?
Smartmontools should be able to provide the raw attribute values.
C:\Program Files\smartmontools\bin>smartctl.exe -a Z:
smartctl 7.0 2018-12-30 r4883 [x86_64-w64-mingw32-win7-sp1] (sf-7.0-1)
Copyright (C) 2002-18, Bruce Allen, Christian Franke, www.smartmontools.org
=== START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
Device Model: JMicron H/W RAID1
Serial Number: YM1TDXI5LPYPXJZ5IO9S
Firmware Version: 0958
User Capacity: 4,000,728,481,792 bytes [4.00 TB]
Sector Size: 512 bytes logical/physical
Device is: Not in smartctl database [for details use: -P showall]
ATA Version is: ATA/ATAPI-7 (minor revision not indicated)
Local Time is: Mon Mar 04 15:13:51 2019 MST
SMART support is: Available - device has SMART capability.
SMART support is: Enabled
=== START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION ===
SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: PASSED
General SMART Values:
Offline data collection status: (0x00) Offline data collection activity
was never started.
Auto Offline Data Collection: Disabled.
Total time to complete Offline
data collection: ( 0) seconds.
Offline data collection
capabilities: (0x00) Offline data collection not supp
orted.
SMART capabilities: (0x0000) Automatic saving of SMART data
is not implemented.
Error logging capability: (0x00) Error logging NOT supported.
No General Purpose Logging support.
SMART Error Log not supported
SMART Self-test Log not supported
Selective Self-tests/Logging not supportedMarch 5th, 2019, 0:41
March 5th, 2019, 2:39
fzabkar wrote:Sorry, it appears that smartmontools does not support your RAID controller:
https://www.smartmontools.org/wiki/Supported_RAID-Controllers
As for the Current and Worst values, higher is better. It is only when these values begin to fall toward the threshold that you need to worry.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/S.M.A.R.T.
March 5th, 2019, 11:45
As for the Current and Worst values, higher is better. It is only when these values begin to fall toward the threshold that you need to worry.
On his case, its detecting it as a RAID combined drives not each drive alone (i think) the test he ran was on its Drive Letter (for RAID) not separate drives thats why...
March 5th, 2019, 13:39
Not possible because they are in RAID 1, Individual test may change the data and break the mirror. SMART is a good gauge to see how the drive is functioning.
Just remember, RAID cannot replace backup. It is always good to have a backup. The reason I bring this up is that a customer lost lots of data when 2 drives fail in a RAID5 (4 drives) yesterday and he did not have a backup.
March 5th, 2019, 16:28
March 5th, 2019, 17:44
Remove the drives and test them outside of the Raid.
March 5th, 2019, 20:34
March 6th, 2019, 7:55
March 6th, 2019, 11:30
It hasn't for me, but I can't guarantee it won't for you. I wouldn't expect it to mess it up; I've done it several times.
Very likely it will change the drive and it will NOT be identical and break the RAID1, not a good idea.
On Windows, HD Sentinel can often see drives behind the RAID controller, may be worth to check out.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.