May 13th, 2012, 9:06
May 24th, 2012, 19:45
May 25th, 2012, 0:38
djinn wrote:Hello,
I currently have a ST3500418AS with firmware CC49 (forced update from CC46 stock firmware)
...
It's worth noting that I upgraded the firmware by hand, because the Seagate update tool refused to do that, using command line parameters told by fzabkar in Seagate forums to another user with the same issue (I think this user is registered here too). No problems after that.
May 25th, 2012, 1:13
BlackST wrote:djinn wrote:Hello,
I currently have a ST3500418AS with firmware CC49 (forced update from CC46 stock firmware)
...
It's worth noting that I upgraded the firmware by hand, because the Seagate update tool refused to do that, using command line parameters told by fzabkar in Seagate forums to another user with the same issue (I think this user is registered here too). No problems after that.
That's where your problems started.
May 25th, 2012, 1:26
May 25th, 2012, 7:06
djinn wrote:In other forum, one user told me that nowadays Seagate has a poor quality check at factory ...
djinn wrote:... and, as time goes by, it's 'normal' some sectors are moved from the P-List to the G-List... Is it true?
May 25th, 2012, 11:03
Please, examine it and tell me if I should replace the drive with Seagate or if this failure rate may be considered 'normal' for this model (I've read similar problems of many reallocated sectors for this drive and some people say it's okay if the bad sector count doesn't increase on a regular basis (?) ).
May 25th, 2012, 11:05
May 25th, 2012, 11:10
harddriverecovery wrote:Please, examine it and tell me if I should replace the drive with Seagate or if this failure rate may be considered 'normal' for this model (I've read similar problems of many reallocated sectors for this drive and some people say it's okay if the bad sector count doesn't increase on a regular basis (?) ).
The failure rate looks pretty normal to me. I wouldn't worry about replacing the drive with another Seagate. Go for it.
May 25th, 2012, 18:55
BlackST wrote:harddriverecovery wrote:The failure rate looks pretty normal to me. I wouldn't worry about replacing the drive with another Seagate. Go for it.
No it isn't. It is also "probably fixable" . And are you thinking about a RMA by a chance ?!?
May 25th, 2012, 23:20
fzabkar wrote:BlackST wrote:harddriverecovery wrote:The failure rate looks pretty normal to me. I wouldn't worry about replacing the drive with another Seagate. Go for it.
No it isn't. It is also "probably fixable" . And are you thinking about a RMA by a chance ?!?
The "failure rate" is perfectly normal. I've been watching Seagate's forums over the past few years, and such "reallocated sector" issues are very common. It's particularly prevalent in refurbished drives, so I suggest that the OP stay away from these. Unfortunately a warranty replacement will probably be refurbished. AISI, refurbishing a drive with bad sectors or a bad head is like sweeping dust under the carpet. The exception is when a head is "cut', but this reduces the capacity of the drive.
I would add that data recovery companies generally see dead drives rather than "weak" ones, so their observations regarding reallocated sector counts would not necessarily match typical user experiences.
May 26th, 2012, 1:38
fzabkar wrote:The "failure rate" is perfectly normal. I've been watching Seagate's forums over the past few years, and such "reallocated sector" issues are very common. It's particularly prevalent in refurbished drives, so I suggest that the OP stay away from these. Unfortunately a warranty replacement will probably be refurbished. AISI, refurbishing a drive with bad sectors or a bad head is like sweeping dust under the carpet. The exception is when a head is "cut', but this reduces the capacity of the drive.
I would add that data recovery companies generally see dead drives rather than "weak" ones, so their observations regarding reallocated sector counts would not necessarily match typical user experiences.
May 26th, 2012, 3:08
poehere wrote:Really? I know a lot of people who refurbish drives. Not sure where this information came from. Seagate forum?
May 26th, 2012, 13:42
May 26th, 2012, 14:32
May 26th, 2012, 14:48
All I'm saying is that I wouldn't trust them. I have seen numerous reports from users in various forums where replacement drives have developed bad sectors within a very short time. In fact I've seen war stories at Seagate's forum where a user has received three replacements in a row with the same outcome. I personally have RMA-ed a dozen drives to Maxtor in the past, in the one shipment. I'm still using two of the replacements, but 4 of them failed soon after.poehere wrote:Just curious what proof you have that a refurbished drive is no good.
May 26th, 2012, 14:53
May 26th, 2012, 15:35
May 26th, 2012, 18:46
BlackST wrote:Ann, it is a pointless discussion.
I wrote:
Final note : I am curious to know if you or someone you like (or someone who likes you, who knows?) would offer pro refurb service, would you be advertising and suggesting his website at every given post where there is a problem of bad blocks. Would in this case not be "sweeping dust under the carpet" but "a professional service that saves money and also is good for environment" or what else ?
This only because your behaviour - at least to me - is strange : since when you came in 2009 every now and then you had something to say (and not kind words) against the DR community, suddenly NOW you are suggesting or better advertising... DR SERVICES. No more DIY ? No more suggestions about buying a tool then try to resell it later when the job is done ? Would you mind explain what or who did you change your mind "180 degrees" ?
There will be no answer .
May 26th, 2012, 20:09
fzabkar wrote:All I'm saying is that I wouldn't trust them.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.