August 30th, 2012, 16:14
August 30th, 2012, 16:24
August 30th, 2012, 16:34
August 30th, 2012, 16:58
August 30th, 2012, 17:44
August 31st, 2012, 3:30
August 31st, 2012, 12:21
August 31st, 2012, 14:24
homeschool74 wrote:It turns out that with the old PCB the drive would turn on.
homeschool74 wrote:It clicks. It sounds like the head is seeking on the platter.
homeschool74 wrote:Both PCB's make the same sound.
homeschool74 wrote:Or could the new PCB just cause the head to seek without the old ROM?
August 31st, 2012, 15:02
August 31st, 2012, 19:15
September 1st, 2012, 5:57
SAjunky wrote:OP didn't say that drive spins up. So it looks like an early hurraaahhhh!
I would continue with ROM transfer (with compatible board of course). We don't know whether a new board is compatible, but it behaves typical for the board with no ROM transplant.
homeschool74 wrote:It turns out that with the old PCB the drive would turn on. It clicks. It sounds like the head is seeking on the platter. Both PCB's make the same sound. I guess it isn't the PCB.. Or could the new PCB just cause the head to seek without the old ROM?
Any other ideas?
September 1st, 2012, 11:18
pcimage wrote:That sounds like it spins to me, or am I missing something?
September 1st, 2012, 11:30
SAjunky wrote:pcimage wrote:That sounds like it spins to me, or am I missing something?
No. It says, is is attempting to spin and engage actuator. It doesn't say that motor is spinning up at normal speed. Not at all. Too early hourraahhh!
September 2nd, 2012, 7:11
mr_spokk wrote:If the drive clicks it means that the heads is trying to lock on servo and the rpm is up at desired speed.
mr_spokk wrote:Could be Pcb though (@ 1%), rest of the 99% goes to bad head(s).
September 2nd, 2012, 7:33
SAjunky wrote:pcimage wrote:That sounds like it spins to me, or am I missing something?
No. It says, is is attempting to spin and engage actuator. It doesn't say that motor is spinning up at normal speed. Not at all. Too early hourraahhh!
September 2nd, 2012, 9:53
SAjunky wrote:mr_spokk wrote:Could be Pcb though (@ 1%), rest of the 99% goes to bad head(s).
Even it is little chance (which I doubt), there was a question quite recently "what would you do? " - opening drive without checking PCB? Answer was clear - "do easy part first".
But you continue advice people otherwise.
September 2nd, 2012, 10:07
September 2nd, 2012, 10:26
SAjunky wrote:Also answer yourself the following question: How MPU do meassure spindle rotational speed?
SAjunky wrote:The only possible answer is gathering servo frequency by reading heads.
September 2nd, 2012, 16:08
Vulcan wrote:It's a shame that the OP has not returned, to clarify the discrepancies between their early and later comments, but perhaps they now have the information that they wanted, and so they might never return to the thread...
If you say MPU do not meassure jitter from servo, you are wrong. I can be wrong to above too, all I can say that actuator is engaged before required speed is reached.Vulcan wrote:SAjunky wrote:The only possible answer is gathering servo frequency by reading heads.
Wrong. If you research how the spindle motor controller functionality (separate or integrated) works on modern disk drives, then you'll find your mistake and see that the heads are not used in they way that you say
OK, let me explain: OP received honest advice from pcimage. Then you came to an action saying OP is contradicting itself. If I get such reply I would go elsewere.Vulcan wrote:Why be so aggressive criticising others, when you have an incorrect understanding of how this functionality works?
September 2nd, 2012, 16:19
SAjunky wrote:If you say MPU do not meassure jitter from servo, you are wrong.
Vulcan wrote:Since you'll just argue with whatever I explain, I'll leave you to discover the truth for yourself, so then you don't "shoot the messenger" (me) - again.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.