December 3rd, 2024, 17:30
December 3rd, 2024, 20:08
December 3rd, 2024, 20:31
December 4th, 2024, 1:25
fzabkar wrote:https://mh-nexus.de/en/hxd/
December 4th, 2024, 1:27
Zero Alpha wrote:Are the files trash on the source drive? Because a clone will just be an exact copy of whatever is wrong with the source drive.
If you are trying to recover data that was lost from a quick format then maybe you should try a software tool instead.
December 4th, 2024, 1:28
fzabkar wrote:Although the FS is exFAT, I'm wondering if the data were TRIM-ed.
December 4th, 2024, 1:38
December 5th, 2024, 5:29
fzabkar wrote:Do you see zeros? If yes, then the files have been TRIM-ed.
December 5th, 2024, 5:52
December 5th, 2024, 6:04
fzabkar wrote:What was the original file system?
Can you upload a sample file to a file sharing service, or at least the first few sectors of a problematic file?
Are there any problems with the SMART attributes, eg reallocated sectors?
December 5th, 2024, 6:11
Pandemicc wrote:It was an ExFAT, disk was working fine, only quick formated
December 5th, 2024, 6:12
fzabkar wrote:Pandemicc wrote:It was an ExFAT, disk was working fine, only quick formated
That means that you destroyed the FATs. That's where the cluster chains are stored. Any recovered file that was originally fragmented will be corrupt because only the first fragment will be intact.
December 5th, 2024, 6:38
December 5th, 2024, 6:40
fzabkar wrote:Actually, I examined both JPEG samples and found no 0xFFD8 signature. However, both files had a 0xFFD9 signature at around 64 sectors from the end. This leads me to suspect that your data have been shifted by 64 sectors.
R-Photo is freeware. Give that a try.
December 5th, 2024, 7:14
Pandemicc wrote:fzabkar wrote:Actually, I examined both JPEG samples and found no 0xFFD8 signature. However, both files had a 0xFFD9 signature at around 64 sectors from the end. This leads me to suspect that your data have been shifted by 64 sectors.
R-Photo is freeware. Give that a try.
Run R-photo on the image? I already use T80 isn't that supposed to be more powerful?
December 5th, 2024, 7:16
fzabkar wrote:Pandemicc wrote:fzabkar wrote:Actually, I examined both JPEG samples and found no 0xFFD8 signature. However, both files had a 0xFFD9 signature at around 64 sectors from the end. This leads me to suspect that your data have been shifted by 64 sectors.
R-Photo is freeware. Give that a try.
Run R-photo on the image? I already use T80 isn't that supposed to be more powerful?
Sorry, I wasn't paying attention. I don't know what else to suggest except raw recovery (file carving).
December 5th, 2024, 13:06
December 5th, 2024, 15:18
fzabkar wrote:Raw recovery identifies files based on their signatures. None of your sample files have any signatures, or at least none that I recognise.
December 5th, 2024, 15:58
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.