June 29th, 2026, 15:09
June 29th, 2026, 16:13
June 29th, 2026, 16:32
fzabkar wrote:It seems strange to me that an overvoltage on the 12V rail is now showing up as a problem with head #1.
Normally, the only damage would be a 12V TVS diode and the associated fuse.
https://recuperodatos.com/sites/default/files/webform/donantes/04107-PCB.jpg
What was damaged on the patient PCB? Is it possible that the drive was connected internally when it initially failed, and was it then connected externally with the wrong adaptor?
June 29th, 2026, 17:07
June 29th, 2026, 17:22
fzabkar wrote:Presumably the larger diode was the damaged one. The smaller diode would have been OK. There would also have been an open fuse.
It seems to me that the solution was to remove the large diode and replace, or bridge, the fuse, assuming that the short was cleared.
FWIW, I notice this model came with several different PCBs -- OA90352, OA90377, OA90381.
June 29th, 2026, 18:03
June 30th, 2026, 2:17
fzabkar wrote:Have you tried the patient's heads in the donor that had the "same exact match"? BTW, I only mentioned the PCB because I'm wondering whether you introduced some kind of weird fault or incompatibility issue.
June 30th, 2026, 4:15
June 30th, 2026, 6:50
pepe wrote:i vote for servo corruption on side 1 due to preamp damage...
June 30th, 2026, 10:35
June 30th, 2026, 11:08
fzabkar wrote:What kind of pathway would result in damage to the preamp that affected head #1 but not head #0? Moreover, since the preamp's supply voltages are derived from the 5V rail, how would an overvoltage on the 12V rail find its way into the 5V side of the motor controller?
June 30th, 2026, 12:31
fzabkar wrote:What kind of pathway would result in damage to the preamp that affected head #1 but not head #0? Moreover, since the preamp's supply voltages are derived from the 5V rail, how would an overvoltage on the 12V rail find its way into the 5V side of the motor controller?
June 30th, 2026, 13:37
June 30th, 2026, 13:57
June 30th, 2026, 14:19
June 30th, 2026, 14:42
June 30th, 2026, 15:00
June 30th, 2026, 15:06
June 30th, 2026, 17:24
pepe wrote:... and this pcb is another wonderful example of genius engineering where the fuse protects the tvs instead of the circuit...
they seem to have corrected it on the newer pcb (90381) though.
June 30th, 2026, 18:11
gameboybin wrote:The original PCB is 90381. May i ask what should i do next? Can you guide me through the steps pepe? I am a little bit lost here
pepe wrote:I would also check the patient MHA in a donor, where it cannot do significant harm (disabling one head at a time).
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.