SamRoitman wrote:
ALL OF THEM WILL DEFEND THIS COURSE.
I was present at the same course with Sam and will back up that statement.
I will also say that Scott never at any time indicated that his course would turn anyone into a DR or forensics expert. Nor did he say that the information that the course was providing could not be obtained through self-study. To the contrary, he clearly stated that much time, practice, and dedication would be needed after this course before attempting a serious (as in data-critical) physical recovery of any sort - and that even with this effort, one could not expect to be able to solve all DR cases without specific knowledge and/or tools. The course is simply intended as a stepping stone to help oneself expedite getting through the 'beginner' stage to get on track for more serious study of DR. And for myself and many others in the course it was exactly that.
Regarding the original question, I would simply assert that the extent of success with taking a distance-learning course of any sort will vary from person to person, and even then from course to course. I can vouch for the material (if you are looking for what I described above), and for the instructor (Scott is an excellent teacher and very responsive to emails), but the medium will be a large factor that only you can determine the manner in which it would affect your own learning capabilities.
While I'm taking the time to comment (don't do this often

), I would like to thank all the DR gurus here on this forum for their remarks throughout these threads. I have been following this forum for close to a year now, and the many useful tidbits I have found have contributed greatly toward advancing my own DR research. So despite the many squabbly, grouchy, and conceited posts

, I believe you guys really deserve a lot of credit for your contributions.
And I will even go so far to say that I wouldn't entirely blame you for being grouchy / conceited.