January 27th, 2011, 8:40
dhiman33 wrote:a)S.M.A.R.T. isn't very reliable and my hdd can fail even before S.M.A.R.T fails.
dhiman33 wrote:b)My hdd has 42 reallocated sectors, the number is not 323.
dhiman33 wrote:c)Until the normalised value drops from 100, there's nothing to worry whatever the sector count is.
dhiman33 wrote:e)My hdd has atleast 500 available sectors for reallocation [...] So until the number reaches this limit...the hdd has low probability of failure.
January 27th, 2011, 21:16
February 3rd, 2011, 18:14
Vulcan wrote:Therefore the Moose drives don't appear to follow the same formula as you describe on your (non-Moose) drives - but as we know, the algorithms used to produce the "cooked" values are commercially sensitive (perhaps not linear?)
August 6th, 2011, 17:26
August 7th, 2011, 0:57
ruseriousb511 wrote:so Dhiman33, its been a few months since your posts about the re-allocation sectors and I was wondering if your HDD is still working or if you have re-placed it ? Mine is showing something like yours was only not quite as high of numbers as yours, mine is showing at 1507517 sectors, and I need to know if it can be fixed or if I need to go ahead and start checking into a new hard-drive ? So what ended up happening with yours, still kicking or got a new one and backed up your files ? what did you use to back up your files ? I have some USB sticks I wiill probably use to back mine up, but I have no idea how long I have. Any info you can give would help immensely, as I just got this computer and have had it for about a week and just found this out about it. I have an HP Compaq Presario X6000 with a 60 gb HDD and I am probably going to go with a 100gb hdd if I have to get a new one, what did you get for yours if you had to re-place the old one ?
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.