Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
Post a reply

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 7th, 2010, 20:38

drc wrote:That's just like the one I fixed. What sort of tools do you have?


How did you fix it?

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 7th, 2010, 21:09

HAHAHAHA this forum is so funny

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 9th, 2010, 7:37

ohh seems im a lucky one

i bought one of this drives wd5000aaks se16 in september 2007 and is one of the most reliable drive i have
almost one full year that worked and smart is completely clean

no read, seek, write , calibration etc etc erros

what kind of firmware problems does this edition have ??

im curious now :/

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 9th, 2010, 9:45

seed.helper wrote:ohh seems im a lucky one

i bought one of this drives wd5000aaks se16 in september 2007 and is one of the most reliable drive i have
almost one full year that worked and smart is completely clean

no read, seek, write , calibration etc etc erros

what kind of firmware problems does this edition have ??

im curious now :/

It does not have a firmware problems.

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 9th, 2010, 15:06

harddrivespecialist wrote:
seed.helper wrote:ohh seems im a lucky one

i bought one of this drives wd5000aaks se16 in september 2007 and is one of the most reliable drive i have
almost one full year that worked and smart is completely clean

no read, seek, write , calibration etc etc erros

what kind of firmware problems does this edition have ??

im curious now :/

It does not have a firmware problems.


thanks 8)

im seems pretty stable to me

more reliable that the new caviar blue

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 9th, 2010, 15:08

seed.helper wrote:more reliable that the new caviar blue


It doesn't take too much :lol:

Re: WD5000AAKS

September 9th, 2010, 15:23

BlackST wrote:
seed.helper wrote:more reliable that the new caviar blue


It doesn't take too much :lol:


lol :oops:

cheaper parts?
Post a reply