August 6th, 2008, 7:08
zed wrote:N.C, Thanks.
I searched for XFS, it's not a XFS. The toos i have would have picked it up (e.g X-Ways).
What would you suggest in order to repair the file system if i'm not sure what it is to begin with?
zed wrote:"One somewhat unusual item I noticed while exploring the DS-101 flash image was the use of the Reiser filesystem. I had not previously seen this filesystem used in a consumer NAS device, so decided to do some additional exploration. I took the IDE drive out of the DS-101 and hooked it to my Desktop Linux system so that I could explore the filesystem. My first attempt to simply mount one of the partitions failed, with an error indicating that the partition was not in Reiser format!"
zed wrote:Next, I did a simple ASCII dump of the first section of the partition to see if I was mistaken about the filesystem used. This is where I saw something curious. A standard Linux filesystem will have an ASCII signature present to tell the operating system what kind of filesystem is present. For Reiser, this will normally be "ReIsEr2Fs", but on the DS-101 initialized disk, I saw an "SyNoRs2Fs". Reading between the lines, this indicated to me that perhaps this was a "Synology Reiser2 Filesystem." Had Synology created a custom Reiser2 Filesystem? Or maybe they had just put in a custom signature.
To test this theory (don't try this at home kids!) I bypassed the filesystem by writing directly to the raw hard drive and overwrote the signature with the standard one. After I did this, I was able to mount the filesystem without error and I could see the top-level directories on the disk. But when I tried to examine any of the files, I would get an error indicating that the file didn't exist. This told me that it really was a modified Reiser filesystem, and not just a change in signature."
August 6th, 2008, 7:14
August 6th, 2008, 7:16
August 6th, 2008, 9:28
June 17th, 2010, 20:59
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.