September 4th, 2012, 15:31
Vulcan wrote:@smportis,
...
Regarding the not-quite-dead drive which still reports 750GB, the ddrescue commands in your latest comment are wrong. The ddrescue infile and outfile parameters should be /dev[/something] devices (you must be sure that you use the correct device names - this is vital!), and not /media[/something] mounted filesystems.
...
September 4th, 2012, 17:14
Vulcan wrote:@smportis,
This attempt may still be unsuccessful, as there is a specific failure mode of recent Seagate drives (esp 7200.11 & .12) - we won't know unless you try ddrescue (correctly). However I have not yet seen a successful DIY recovery of a drive with that behaviour. On the other hand, drives with that behaviour have been recovered using a hardware imager (specifically Deepspar), which could be done at a suitable DR company. IMHO, for a DIY result, all you can hope for is that the drive has not yet deteriorated to that level.
September 5th, 2012, 20:31
September 5th, 2012, 20:42
Vulcan wrote:Thanks for clearing-up that the drescue commands in your comment using /media were typos, and valid commands were actually typed (though since I don't know in which order your system recognised / enumerated the source & destination drives, I can't say that the command was actually correct or not....) and for explaining what that 16GB drive was (i.e. it wasn't the clicking drive).
In my experience using ddrescue with various drives, copying zero sectors is unusual, though not impossible, for a drive which reports correctly in the BIOS. You might have reached the end of a DIY recovery attempt, if the drive really is that sick, or there may be some other problem, which would require interpretation of the relevant Linux error messages when running ddrescue, to try to identify.
September 5th, 2012, 23:39
September 6th, 2012, 2:26
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.