Newer, Bigger, Faster --- Harder to Recover??
October 22nd, 2008, 4:30
Hi all -
Just after some opinions - just been reading review on the new Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB drive which boasts 375GB platters -
Surely there is a limit where operations such as head stack and platter swaps are going to become unachievable due to tolerences inside the chamber.
Anyone seeing the new high capacity drives coming in yet?
=Whats your opinion??
Just after some opinions - just been reading review on the new Seagate 7200.11 1.5TB drive which boasts 375GB platters -
Surely there is a limit where operations such as head stack and platter swaps are going to become unachievable due to tolerences inside the chamber.
Anyone seeing the new high capacity drives coming in yet?
=Whats your opinion??
Re: Newer, Bigger, Faster --- Harder to Recover??
October 22nd, 2008, 4:43
No problems except their users.
Re: Newer, Bigger, Faster --- Harder to Recover??
October 22nd, 2008, 5:03
Im actually looking forward to recovering one of these 
Re: Newer, Bigger, Faster --- Harder to Recover??
October 22nd, 2008, 8:16
As long as your techniques are good then you should have no problems. When moving from the small drives to the larger 1Tb drives our techniques were used as normal and all proved OK.
The situation is that doing physical work with a drive is mostly marred by mental power. If you think it is going to fail, it probably will.
Realising that the parts do all the work and tolerence deficiencies are covered by using compatible parts is the main hurdle covered.
And if in doubt. Practice, practice, practice.
The situation is that doing physical work with a drive is mostly marred by mental power. If you think it is going to fail, it probably will.
Realising that the parts do all the work and tolerence deficiencies are covered by using compatible parts is the main hurdle covered.
And if in doubt. Practice, practice, practice.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.