Data recovery and disk repair questions and discussions related to old-fashioned SATA, SAS, SCSI, IDE, MFM hard drives - any type of storage device that has moving parts
April 9th, 2010, 22:14
Granted I've not performed but just a handful of head replacements, but I've thoroughly enjoyed reading through the forums here. The question I have is that it seems a lot of time and resources are poured into diagnosing problems with drives when the problem could have "simply" been resolved by a head swap. I understand the difficulty in finding a good donar match but once a proper parts drive is found a head swap isn't rocket science to perform. Heck, I don't even have a clean room and I've never had a head swap go bad (except for my *experiments* of course
Am I over simplifying this or just overlooking something? I can't count the number of solutions I've read through here that have fallen into a category of either a PCB replacement or a head swap. Sprinkle in the Seagate BSY bug and proper software imaging and it seems to me that 98% of all data recovery falls into one of these groups.
April 9th, 2010, 22:20
Sure, its just like being a doctor... 98% of all patients either need some medicine or surgery, right?
April 9th, 2010, 22:46
drc wrote:Sure, its just like being a doctor... 98% of all patients either need some medicine or surgery, right?
I take it your point is that doing a head swap on a drive that happens to fall into the 2% category could likely kill the drive. Gotcha. I figured I was over-simplifying it.
April 9th, 2010, 23:14
No, my point is that if you had a magical diagnostic machine that would tell you with 100% accuracy that a head swap was required, and a magical head-swap machine that would instantly and automatically generate a set of perfectly compatible heads, install them perfectly, and automatically resolve any other issues (alignment, media damage, etc) that might interfere with the process, then sure, it would be simple.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.