April 12th, 2010, 18:57
April 13th, 2010, 17:12
April 13th, 2010, 17:43
April 13th, 2010, 18:49
April 14th, 2010, 4:56
April 16th, 2010, 13:59
fzabkar wrote:Many authors of SMART software misinterpret the attribute data. For example, HD Tune's author appears not to understand the importance of the uppermost 16 bits of the 48-bit raw values. You will also occasionally see nonsensical negative numbers for read and write counts. In your particular case, the author is paranoid about spinup times. Samsung doesn't help by using counterintuitive normalised values. Normally one would expect that 100 would be the target for a "perfect" drive, but after looking at other SMART reports for your model (see below), I've come to the conclusion that the following formula applies:
normalised value = 100 - ((raw value - 800) / 300)
The raw value appears to represent the spinup time in milliseconds.
A value of 100 equates to an unrealistic spinup time of 800 msec.
The loss of each point equates to an increase in spinup time of 300 ms.
Here are several forum threads with SMART data for your model:
http://homeservershow.com/forums/topic/ ... c-reported
http://www.techsupportforum.com/hardwar ... hdd-2.html
http://www.pretaktovanie.sk/phpBB3/view ... 13&t=53196
http://pctforum.tyden.cz/viewtopic.php? ... &sk=t&sd=a
http://forum.pclab.pl/t545991.html
should-send-new-samsung-hd154ui-back-t13837.html
Here are some numbers I've collated, many for new drives.
51 15430
63 11900
63 11850
71 9490
72 9260
72 9260
76 7910
77 7840
78 7400
Therefore, on the basis of the SMART report, it would appear that your drive is perfectly healthy. However, the dip in the preformance graph suggests that there may be a bad patch in the media, although the dip may also be due to other processes interfering with the test.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.