jadamski wrote:
Thanks for your responses. I will be clearer next time.
Thanks - it would have helped to know the full story at the beginning...
I don't have much time to assist with remote support, but I'll give you some comments in the hope that they help.
First - as I said before and I'll say it again: this situation is
nothing to do with the LLF Tool. In your extra details, you've confirmed that your disk drive was "not recognised" [see below] after the "partition removal" that you did, which was
before you ran LLF Tool.
jadamski wrote:
The problem came when I deleted the partitions using the Ubuntu utility.
So please, stop wasting your time focussing on LLF Tool. Unless you've invented time travel, such that LLF Tool can affect behaviour before it is run, then you have already said that your problem existed before you did that

Second - due to the variables which you've got (Windows vs. Ubuntu; PATA attach vs. USB enclosure; no details of how you're booting / choosing either OS) and without knowing which setup you have right now, it's impossible for me to suggest data collection which would apply to your current config, since I don't know which of the 4 possibilities you currently have setup (i.e. no use giving instructions for Windows if you're now running Ubuntu etc.).
The output of dmesg from Linux with the disk attached via PATA would show you whether the disk itself is being recognised (e.g. /dev/hda - but it could be hdb etc.) even though there will be no listed logical drives (e.g. /dev/hda1). That is where I would start, but there are several approaches which could be used.
jadamski wrote:
After partition removal, the disk is not recognized by either the bios as a regular hard disk or in it's USB case as a "mass storage" device.
With a normal direct-attached PATA drive, which will therefore be reported directly by the BIOS in normal motherboards (unless you've got a very non-standard config), then simply deleting any partitions, on its own, will not remove that disk from the "storage setup" screen (or whatever it is called on your BIOS) where the detected disk drives are listed. That is because the BIOS does not read (or care about) partitions at that point (it just uses ATA Identify Device, and sometimes Set Features, commands to identify and report the disk model in the setup screen). (Other parts of the BIOS, e.g. hibernation settings, may care about partitions, but we're not talking about that.)
Perhaps your BIOS setup was not configured to list the drive even before the partitions were deleted (e.g. the storage setup was "IDE = none" or similar)? So then when you checked the BIOS after deleting the partions, the disk still wasn't reported there - but that has nothing to do with deleting the partitions...
Third - you wouldn't be able to run LLF Tool if Windows didn't believe that the disk existed! (as
drc pointed out)

How do you explain that you're saying the disk is not "recognised" (in the ways that you describe), yet you were able to run LLF Tool, and hence Windows was able to detect and report that disk's existance via its APIs to LLF Tool - i.e. Windows
does "recognise" it? Therefore we've got some contradictions here - the situation cannot be exactly as you've described it IMHO, although I'm sure you're doing your best to explain things.
I'd probably start by using PATA attach, finding out how to remove any concerns about the disk not being shown in the BIOS setup (which may be another BIOS setting, as I explain above), since that cannot be the result of deleting partitions - and then move forwards from there - but it's up to you
