fzabkar wrote:I would think another good idea would be for each drive's adaptive data to be stored in a central database. Then the manufacturers could supply fully working, pre-programmed PCBs to their customers.
Not all drive / families store stuff on PCBs . Again, PCB is useful but not absolutely necessary for DR if totally destroyed - personally when PCB was already "touched" by customers, I discard it intentionally or ask not to give me it as it is completely useless.
Everything depends on DR skills. Also, it is impossible because of legal / intellectual property issues and patents on EVERYTHING on the device, including microcode and derivative parts, artwork, PCB, schematics etc. etc.
Some data in the wrong hands could give manufacturers, DR and also end users even more problems, so thank God it's like that and it will stay this way.
This should make forget the idea of such database open to public.
About supplying PCBs it is not possible because STOCK is a PURE COST and you pay taxes on inventory, so manufacturers would not store spare PCBs for a simple economic reason - not to talk about obsolescence and about the fact that if a firmware update was applied to the drive, it is another problem to consider.
Manufacturers tend to work with just-in-time basis , to maximize profit and minimize loss / costs / taxes / inventory. That's life.
People who sell PCBs are another thing : usually they buy stocks of scrap materials and then sort the parts that can have an aftermarket.
fzabkar wrote:Moreover, I would like to see manufacturers stand behind their products by offering physical data recovery services on a non-profit basis. That's the least they could do to placate their customers, especially as current products have serious quality problems and high failure rates.
Impossible. It's market economy the world we're living in and all business are profit oriented, not charity oriented.
Current products are supported for warranty and RMA and that's the only thing manufacturers MUST/SHOULD fulfill. They sell devices and data inside is not under any warranty - written statement !! Note : the fact that Seagate offered a remedy for the flaws of .11 firmware if it is proven to be the cause means that they were concerned about the problem.
Leolo wrote:However, I'm very intrigued to know the reason why drive manufacturers don't offer official data recovery for their own products.
For the same opposite reason why DR companies don't make HDDs.
If you make bottles, you don't care about what will be the use of the bottles or what kind of fluid the end user will put in and you are not responsible if the bottled wine turn into vinegar. If you make bottles you just warn EU about not to drop them as glass is fragile, not to put some chemicals on it as it will attack glass and to use them within certain specs.
I see some analogies....

Final note : customers are not always right : there's a limit for decency at both side (mfg's and EUs) - the demand for lower cost drives, dumping , TTM pressure, counterfeiting and most of all the craziness of many EUs lead to problems but summing up I didn't hear (yet) about death or injury or blasts or serious problems because of data loss, and even if such episode exist it would be pure statistics while 99,99% of the drives contain just irrelevant personal data.
If you loose your ID or driving license or important document because of theft or neglicence, you pay the cost for having it back. Stored data is exactly the same - with appropriate procedures the risk is mitigated and all you loss is just the downtime while setting back system / data.