December 19th, 2011, 10:08
December 19th, 2011, 11:51
December 19th, 2011, 12:07
northwind wrote:
I can clearly see this is a Seagate drive.
December 19th, 2011, 12:12
v3rcingetorige wrote:northwind wrote:
I can clearly see this is a Seagate drive.
Yes.. It IS !!
..but... a Momentus 5400.6 ... not supported from SeDiv... but with Master password revision code FFFEH (never changed)... but Seagate+25SPC not work..
Bye!
December 19th, 2011, 12:18
v3rcingetorige wrote:northwind wrote:
I can clearly see this is a Seagate drive.
Yes.. It IS !!
..but... a Momentus 5400.6 ... not supported from SeDiv... but with Master password revision code FFFEH (never changed)... but Seagate+25SPC not work..
Bye!
loki wrote:
Dam Northwind your goodbut then again you knew I'd say that
December 19th, 2011, 12:28
northwind wrote:v3rcingetorige wrote:northwind wrote:
I can clearly see this is a Seagate drive.
Yes.. It IS !!
..but... a Momentus 5400.6 ... not supported from SeDiv... but with Master password revision code FFFEH (never changed)... but Seagate+25SPC not work..
Bye!
This can be unlocked by a pro who has the right equipment.loki wrote:
Dam Northwind your goodbut then again you knew I'd say that
December 20th, 2011, 1:45
December 20th, 2011, 5:34
fzabkar wrote:If the master password is set to default, then it should be possible to Secure Erase the drive:
http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/hughes/SecureErase.html
http://cmrr.ucsd.edu/people/Hughes/HDDEraseReadMe.txt
December 20th, 2011, 7:54
v3rcingetorige wrote:with Master password revision code FFFEH (never changed)
December 20th, 2011, 11:17
Vulcan wrote:@v3rcingetorige:v3rcingetorige wrote:with Master password revision code FFFEH (never changed)
FYI that does not mean that the password was never changed, so you cannot assume anything about the master password set on your drive from that value. This is a common misunderstanding, which is repeated in many places on the internet
December 20th, 2011, 11:44
v3rcingetorige wrote:But.. If the Master Password revision code is FFFE, i suppose the master password is the factory password..
Is it wrong?
v3rcingetorige wrote:Also... if Seagate have placed a "Random Password" is a BIG, BIG problem..
December 20th, 2011, 12:24
Vulcan wrote:v3rcingetorige wrote:But.. If the Master Password revision code is FFFE, i suppose the master password is the factory password..
Is it wrong?
Yes, that interpretation is wrong - it may, or may not, be the original master password with that revision code value.v3rcingetorige wrote:Also... if Seagate have placed a "Random Password" is a BIG, BIG problem..
I said nothing about a random password - my point is simply about the revision code, as I explain above, so that you don't waste time using an incorrect assumption. That is all.
December 20th, 2011, 17:57
v3rcingetorige wrote:But.. If the Master Password revision code is FFFE, i suppose the master password is the factory password..
Is it wrong?
December 21st, 2011, 5:23
fzabkar wrote:v3rcingetorige wrote:But.. If the Master Password revision code is FFFE, i suppose the master password is the factory password..
Is it wrong?
Here is an excerpt from Section 4.20.11 of the ATA standard:
Working Draft AT Attachment 8 - ATA/ATAPI Command Set (ATA8-ACS):
http://www.t13.org/documents/UploadedDo ... A8-ACS.pdf
==================================================================
The Master Password Identifier is an optional feature in the Security feature set.
The intended purpose of this feature is to assist an administrator that uses several sets of Master passwords (e.g., for use in different deployments of devices). The administrator may maintain a mapping of actual Master passwords and a corresponding Identifier. When an administrator sets a Master password, the corresponding Master Password Identifier may also be set.
The Master Password Identifier does not indicate whether a Master Password exists or is valid.
Support for this feature is reported in the IDENTIFY DEVICE ... data in word 92. Valid identifiers are 0001h through FFFEh. A value of 0000h or FFFFh indicates that this feature is not supported.
If the device supports the Security feature set, then ... prior to first use, the Master Password Identifier shall be set to FFFEh by the manufacturer.
==================================================================
December 21st, 2011, 13:58
v3rcingetorige wrote:> ..0000h or FFFFh indicates that this feature is not supported.
Not supported.. Ok is clear now!
v3rcingetorige wrote:I try another mainboard, but "Compatible" option for sata device is not supported and HDDErase don't detect the hdd on sata bus.. (only for a test...)
December 22nd, 2011, 1:58
Vulcan wrote:v3rcingetorige wrote:> ..0000h or FFFFh indicates that this feature is not supported.
Not supported.. Ok is clear now!
It's not clear to me
At the beginning, you said your drive reported a value of FFFEh which means that the feature is supported on that drive, and FFFEh would have been the initial value of the revision code set at the factory. However that does not change my comments above - any subsequent changes to the master password do not necessarily change that revision code.v3rcingetorige wrote:I try another mainboard, but "Compatible" option for sata device is not supported and HDDErase don't detect the hdd on sata bus.. (only for a test...)
If you want to try HDDErase as suggested by fzabkar, then what option names do you have (if any), for the SATA controller setting on your "mainboard" BIOS? Not all BIOSes use the option name "compatible" for their SATA controller's ATA emulation mode.
If your motherboard has an IDE port, then another option is to buy a cheap IDE-SATA converter board, and then attach your SATA drive via that IDE port. Other options are also possible.
Neither of your threads explained how the drive was originally locked - what method was used to do that?
December 22nd, 2011, 14:39
v3rcingetorige wrote:I buy an "Out of order" netbook, and the HDD installed was Password protected.
I think... it was locked by BIOS option. [my underlining]
v3rcingetorige wrote:I read FFFe and not FFFF...FFFEh password revision code IS supported...OKVulcan wrote:any subsequent changes to the master password do not necessarily change that revision code.
Clear now!
v3rcingetorige wrote:Vulcan wrote:If your motherboard has an IDE port, then another option is to buy a cheap IDE-SATA converter board, and then attach your SATA drive via that IDE port. Other options are also possible.
I will try my Netbook because it have "Compatible" option in the bios..
January 2nd, 2012, 7:17
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.