January 26th, 2013, 18:44
January 30th, 2013, 16:24
January 30th, 2013, 17:50
January 30th, 2013, 17:54
January 31st, 2013, 10:08
l0ft1369 wrote:taken down after I re-read his post haha. What OS did you use? and what controller are these disks hooked up too?
-L0ft
February 1st, 2013, 11:14
February 2nd, 2013, 7:30
harddriverecovery wrote:Yikes. Looks like you've got a heck of a job ahead of you. Good luck!
February 3rd, 2013, 13:51
Spildit wrote:It would be easy if you manage to grab a working extrenal case equal to the one it used to be in, plug the drives in the same order and do the R-Studio scan on that. Most likely is RAID-0 so the data is divided on the 2 drives, and that explains the damaged photos, you are retriving part of the jpg from one drive and lacking the other pieces on the other drive. Try to re-create the RAID array with software if you can't get a external enclosure like the one it used to have.
Good luck.
April 1st, 2013, 12:23
Spildit wrote:What i was saying is that most likely the Iomega 1TB case / drive will use the 2 500 GB drives as RAID0 internally, even if you friend is sure he just plugged the thing in using USB on windows whithout RAID.
In my idea the enclosure itself have used the drives in RAID-0 even if your friend is not aware of it.
Clone the drives first. Then work with the clones, even if you do more damage to it, at least you will have the original to clone again and try once more.
April 1st, 2013, 17:43
bobhoskin wrote:how I know what was the order of the 2 500GB HDs inside the original enclosure?
April 2nd, 2013, 8:50
fzabkar wrote:It is showing a Windows XP/2K MBR and a single NTFS partition (type 07) beginning at sector 63 (=0x3F) with a capacity of 0x74709843 sectors.
0x74709843 sectors x 512 bytes per sector = 1 000 210 466 304 bytes
......................
April 2nd, 2013, 9:25
bobhoskin wrote:fzabkar wrote:It is showing a Windows XP/2K MBR and a single NTFS partition (type 07) beginning at sector 63 (=0x3F) with a capacity of 0x74709843 sectors.
0x74709843 sectors x 512 bytes per sector = 1 000 210 466 304 bytes
......................
Wow, in a fast view of the links you posted, I begin to come crazy.... but something I'm starting to understand
Like you say it seems there is a boot sector on the HD you mentioned (ST3500841AS3 : 3PG03ZKX)
http://i.imgur.com/6EvKTUk.jpg
The other HD, at sector 63 shows:
http://i.imgur.com/ksy01Si.jpg
This evening when I come home I'll check the backup of this boot sector at the end of the partition.
Thank you Fzabkar and Spildit
p.s. I was forgot to post this Scan Information, maybe can help...?:
http://i.imgur.com/blKoWsJ.jpg
April 3rd, 2013, 4:22
bobhoskin wrote:p.s. I was forgot to post this Scan Information, maybe can help...?:
http://i.imgur.com/blKoWsJ.jpg
April 3rd, 2013, 12:52
hddguy wrote:bobhoskin wrote:p.s. I was forgot to post this Scan Information, maybe can help...?:
http://i.imgur.com/blKoWsJ.jpg
Try it as virtual RAID Set (set as RAID0) instead of Virtual Volume Set
April 5th, 2013, 9:10
April 5th, 2013, 13:44
April 5th, 2013, 15:17
dick wrote:I know there are different Iomega setups floating about but I just recovered a 1tb Iomega nas with a single drive which turned out to be an XFS mirror raid 1.
I found the usual recovery softwares gave all sorts of conflicting erroneous results and as you don't know what the previous techie did with the drive you shoudn't presume anything.
I used the Nas Data Recovery and it instantly found all the parameters.
Download the trial from here: http://www.runtime.org/nas-recovery.htm
Though probably its all in vain and the data was overwritten!!!
April 5th, 2013, 19:15
April 6th, 2013, 9:37
April 8th, 2013, 8:34
fzabkar wrote:@bobhoskin, can you explain a little better what actually happened?
Did your friend completely clone a 1TB drive onto the external Iomega 1TB RAID0, or did he stop before it finished? Has the clone been initialised, formatted, or otherwise modified since then? What capacity was the PC HDD?
Are you trying to recover the original data on the Iomega, before the cloning operation, or are you trying to extract newly cloned data from the PC HDD?
BTW, the original Iomega box cannot have been a NAS because it makes no sense to clone a physical drive to a network drive. You could clone a physical drive to an image file, and then write that image file to your NAS, but that doesn't appear to be what happened in this case.
If you want to see the data on your two drives in its present form, then mount them as a virtual RAID0 with a stripe size of 64KB (= 128 sectors). Then try to clone the RAID onto your 2TB drive.
For safety's sake, you might like to clone each drive, sector by sector, using ddrescue. Clone drive 0 to your 2TB drive by setting the 1TB point as the starting sector on your target. Then clone drive 1 using the 1.5TB point as the starting sector on the target. You need to ensure that the images don't overlap.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.