MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 6:09 
Offline

Joined: November 25th, 2015, 12:08
Posts: 4
Location: Sweden
i own two 4tb Segate hdds. one has been used for more than one and half years without any issue and other one was just recently purchased. i own another 2tb for NAS which been used for the last 2 and half years and it's still working fine without any issue

i own other two of 2tb WD green. one has operated for 306808 hours. its still working fine. and other one used for merely 3000 hours had several failures so i had to put it away.

as far as i am concerned ,Segate isn't as bad as some people claimed.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 7:51 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 4th, 2012, 1:35
Posts: 3903
Location: Adelaide, Australia
unfortunately a few single anecdotes of good luck cant be a big enough set for any kind of numbers. But when you think about it, 1 in 6 is not good. that's a 16.6 failure rate if my math is correct. ouch!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 8:57 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: January 6th, 2015, 2:21
Posts: 186
Location: Germany
Here is a interesting read about drive failure statistics.

https://www.backblaze.com/blog/hard-dri ... y-q3-2015/

_________________
Web: https://www.day1data.de


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 11:15 
Offline

Joined: March 19th, 2015, 15:01
Posts: 1388
Location: isreal
supersteamboy wrote:
i own other two of 2tb WD green. one has operated for 306808 hours. its still working fine.

i would really like to see the DOM (date of manufacture)
306808 / 24 /365 = around 35 years :roll:


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 11:22 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 4th, 2012, 1:35
Posts: 3903
Location: Adelaide, Australia
I take it back then, These Seagates are ahead of their time...


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 15:55 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 11th, 2013, 17:01
Posts: 1772
Location: Phoenix, AZ USA
supersteamboy wrote:
as far as i am concerned ,Segate isn't as bad as some people claimed.

I think you are a 'half full' rather than 'half empty' person :D . Last year the Seagate ST3000DM001 had a failure rate of 43%, so that means 57% of people are very happy with their Seagate.....

_________________
HDD, SSD, Flash and RAID Data Recovery
Founder of The Data Recovery Professionals Group


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 16:37 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 3rd, 2011, 0:19
Posts: 2003
Location: Providence, RI
ddrecovery wrote:
supersteamboy wrote:
as far as i am concerned ,Segate isn't as bad as some people claimed.

I think you are a 'half full' rather than 'half empty' person :D . Last year the Seagate ST3000DM001 had a failure rate of 43%, so that means 57% of people are very happy with their Seagate.....


And the other 43% had to come pay our high recovery prices, and now are very unhappy.

_________________
Data Medics - Hard Drive, SSD, and RAID Data Recovery Service Company


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 19:08 
Offline

Joined: March 19th, 2015, 15:01
Posts: 1388
Location: isreal
data-medics wrote:
And the other 43% had to come pay our high recovery prices, and now are very unhappy.

+1
considering that seagate is the second largest HDD supplier in world, then... we are talking about a lot of people that got hurt


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: My experience with Segate
PostPosted: December 17th, 2015, 19:53 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: June 8th, 2006, 19:44
Posts: 3144
Location: Atlanta, GA
We've bought high capacity Seagate drives (e.g. 4,5, & 6 TB) . . . and used them ONCE to image drives. Then we erased and checked them. All had significant amounts of pending reallocated sectors, so we retired them. Brand new drives! No point in sending them to the factory for green-labeled "refurbished" drives, which we truest even less.

I can only imagine how these things would fare in a server or with heavy-duty operation.

Close to 50% of the drives we see for recovery are Seagates now.

I would like to thank them for helping our business.

_________________
http://www.datasaversllc.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 9 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group