Main » Forums home » Conventional hard drives

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]



Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
  Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 11:38 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Moltke friend no. Can't access to modules. Only 370F=FM_ERR_HEADER_II_SIGNATURE_INVALID

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 11:58 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
pikus_09 wrote:
Moltke friend no. Can't access to modules. Only 370F=FM_ERR_HEADER_II_SIGNATURE_INVALID

wow. already not CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED! :)

if you read 01h (pba or chs) it differs from the original 01h ?
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 12:25 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Moltke do you remeber that SA regions changed +1? Then Can't access SA modules. :arrow: 370F=FM_ERR_HEADER_II_SIGNATURE_INVALID
CA_FLUSH_AL_GOT_CANCELED shows when an attempt is made to access the UserArea :arrow: then it blocked access to SA, ROM, All.
It is possible that the mod 01(it's content) is broken , because the whole is an original FW, FW nothing was changed.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 15:31 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Back region to oryginal state and SA module's work look:
Attachment:
ffff.JPG
ffff.JPG [ 185.92 KiB | Viewed 19627 times ]
checked all modules Work, but contents mod 03, 0C is incorrect, mod 31, 33, 36 are empty :arrow:
which does not change the fact that access to UA should be, and it is not.
So we are at the point of entry, ie,SA working, but there is no access to the User Area.
In contrast, as presented current insight into the zone table:
Attachment:
xxxx.JPG
xxxx.JPG [ 160.73 KiB | Viewed 19627 times ]
:arrow: All heads are the same entries.
A current disk parameters immediately after the procedure Arco present themselves in this way:
Code:
Drive config
Format version = 0x0101
DCM Selection = 0x0001
cur_stroke = 0x0001
phy_heads = 0x0008
used_heads = 00008
cur_capacity = 0x4E20
max_fmt_LBAs = 3907709568 - 2000Gb
target_capacity = 0x0002
max_target_LBAs = 3907029167 - 2000Gb
hq_capacity = 0x0002
max_HQ_LBAs = 3907709568 - 2000Gb
final_capacity = 0x0002
z0_dtpi = 0x0003665C
z0_kfci = 0x00000014
cur_svo_TPI = 0x00038270
cur_data_TPI_0 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_1 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_2 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_3 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_4 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_5 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_6 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_7 = 0x00035F57
cur_data_TPI_8 = 0x00000000
cur_data_TPI_9 = 0x00000000
cur_KFCI_0 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_1 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_2 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_3 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_4 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_5 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_6 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_7 = 0x09C4
cur_KFCI_8 = 0x0000
cur_KFCI_9 = 0x0000
max_LBA_for_head_0 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_1 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_2 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_3 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_4 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_5 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_6 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_7 = 488463696 - 250Gb
max_LBA_for_head_8 = 0 - 0Gb
max_LBA_for_head_9 = 0 - 0Gb
max_user_cyls_for_head_0 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_1 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_2 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_3 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_4 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_5 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_6 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_7 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_8 = 0x00000000
max_user_cyls_for_head_9 = 0x00000000
max_virt_cyls_for_head_0 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_1 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_2 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_3 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_4 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_5 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_6 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_7 = 0x00034101
max_virt_cyls_for_head_8 = 0x00000000
max_virt_cyls_for_head_9 = 0x00000000
rsvd_svo_cyls = 0x0200
rsvd_data_cyls = 0x0100
max_user_svo_cyls = 0x00000000
max_svo_cyls = 0x00039780
trks_per_clstr_svo = 0x0080
trks_per_clstr_rsvd = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_0 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_1 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_2 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_3 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_4 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_5 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_6 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_7 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_8 = 0x0000
trks_per_clstr_for_head_9 = 0x0000
HdMap TPI = 0x31 0x31 0x31 0x31 0x31 0x31 0x31 0x31
HdMap Capacity = 0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04 0x04
Head map TPI, and capacity, max LBA, CURRENT DATA TPI for all head is incorrect.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 15:49 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
so The situation is during the procedure ARCO:
Attachment:
jiji.JPG
jiji.JPG [ 150.02 KiB | Viewed 19626 times ]



Regards, and thank you so much behind all replies :)

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 1st, 2016, 16:14 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Oh spildit friend, I tried, and Nothing of that. Target capacity must be 2, because Plater condition in these drives do not allow you to set options 1.
I also tried the scripts I've written on your forum, but the scripts were other models even though they were from the same family drives.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2016, 9:34 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Anyone have any idea's? Regards friends :)

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2016, 12:15 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
1 - Get an eaqual drive or ask someone with equal drive to test that out. :arrow: with this is a problem, because I have another WD Black for testing.

2 - Ask in general if people can run ARCO on those drives even with other tools. :arrow: WD Black drives are rare and the few it has, because of the price. ps. Newest PC3K certainly moves each WD BLACK, or sediv
3 - Test yourself with another drive. :arrow: self tests on other drives such as the ARCO on WD5000AAKX and on Zephyr WD7500BPVT over Seamlessly, WD15EADS SELFTEST module 28 Seamlessly,
- You must be sure if the problem is with your specific drive or with all drives from that model first. :arrow: the problem is not only in my case, viewing the forum I stumbled on another topic: WD20EZRX CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED

Btw, solutions are 2.
Module 28 with the procedure arco, which is assigned to FW: 00050016F or higher, or a question WD MARVEL Autor to improved ARCO procedure for WD Black and higher. :(
PS, Franc or moltke he probably would have helped something, but first they had to analyze the firmware, but I doubt that they wanted to do :(

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
fzabkar
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2016, 16:33 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 15528
Location: Australia
pikus_09 wrote:
PS, Franc or moltke he probably would have helped something, but first they had to analyze the firmware, but I doubt that they wanted to do :(

Sorry, I have no idea what is going on. I'm just an interested observer.

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 2nd, 2016, 16:40 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
fzabkar wrote:
Sorry, I have no idea what is going on. I'm just an interested observer.

I knew, but I frank thank you for the kind words :) check your PM.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 2:19 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
pikus_09 wrote:
PS, or moltke (

Moltke ?
Quote:
on another topic: WD20EZRX CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED

Quote:
This case has been resolved with the help of drHDD

you need to ask him
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 15:44 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Moltke I know. but my problem is a little different than the user of that.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 17:41 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
clear. Well then, we will wait for a good magician, or that the problem will resolve itself.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 18:29 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
I don't think so, but i think that PCB is fault, or bad solder connection on MCU.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 18:32 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
Because frend, First I want to exclude faulty solder connections, then I will change MCU.

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 19:00 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
but i think that PCB is fault, or bad solder connection on MCU.
well well
Every complex problem has a simple and clear wrong decision.

you want or do not want, and have to deal with sa.
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 19:08 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
So moltke are suggesting that the problem is SA?

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 19:24 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
Quote:
moltke

I will say is the second time that the name is written as Moltke. I did not confuse you with a ficus.
Quote:
are suggesting that the problem is SA?

Yes. and it was already two days ago.
You can even walk in circles. this will not change anything :)
Top
 Profile  
 
pikus_09
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 19:51 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 24th, 2013, 18:13
Posts: 419
Location: Poland
But scan SA surface is good no problems. The modules also, with the exception of the 03 0c. so
Something is not right here. I repeat arco has no access to user area in order to further calibrate the drive :?

_________________
Hello everyone, sorry for my poor english, because i using google translator.
Top
 Profile  
 
Moltke
 Post subject: Re: CA_FLUSH_ALL_GOT_CANCELED - what's wrong?
PostPosted: January 3rd, 2016, 20:06 
Offline

Joined: October 24th, 2005, 17:04
Posts: 242
Quote:
But scan SA surface is good no problems.

This half of the case. disk writes? ie you can write modules or some sort of pattern in sa under normal start, and not under the loader?
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 3 of 4
  [ 72 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

Main » Forums home » Conventional hard drives

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: bigstery, Google Adsense [Bot] and 76 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Switch to mobile style
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group