MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: February 6th, 2025, 6:12 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
If the translator problem is unc, I wonder if I should do the translator recovery first or erase the smart erasure and non g-list and regenerate the translator.
mcmt error: I can't read 340.

Smr is known to have about 100GB of data hidden in MCMT.
So I don't recommend playing the translator, is it correct to restore the translator??
Important modules backed up.
Except for 340 mcmt.

It can't even be read from the outside.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: February 6th, 2025, 20:11 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: April 7th, 2009, 21:36
Posts: 487
These problems should be left alone for experienced engineers only.

_________________
Zero Alpha: zeroalpha.com.au
Find Cheap Donor Drives App: https://www.zeroalpha.com.au/donor-drive-app Updated February 2026


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 14th, 2025, 17:42 
Offline

Joined: September 14th, 2023, 8:43
Posts: 59
Location: Kentucky USA
Well, MCMT is 348 for starters.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 16th, 2025, 22:03 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
Zero Alpha wrote:
These problems should be left alone for experienced engineers only.

Thank you for your answer!
for personal disposal
I'm practicing with a broken hard drive, so I'm studying hard by myself!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 16th, 2025, 22:04 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
beefstrudel wrote:
Well, MCMT is 348 for starters.

Thank you for your response.
If it's broken, is it correct to read by force after recovery to sa lba and then read by ram using the option?
I'm asking because I'm not sure.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 17th, 2025, 3:06 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 6th, 2010, 3:46
Posts: 627
Location: Kolding | Denmark
If possible avoid writing anything to SA. Use write protection.
Read the necessary system files, how they are best read depends on the drive.
A lot of manual correction can be necessary, load into RAM and access data.

Part of the process is well documented in the manual and ACE blog.

_________________
Digitalsupport Data Recovery
https://digitalsupport.dk


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 17th, 2025, 21:08 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
digisupport wrote:
If possible avoid writing anything to SA. Use write protection.
Read the necessary system files, how they are best read depends on the drive.
A lot of manual correction can be necessary, load into RAM and access data.

Part of the process is well documented in the manual and ACE blog.


Thank you for your response.

I read the article to activate the protection option, read the system file and applied it to low quality REM.

But is there a way to check the checksum when there is an error in the system file??

I'm curious about the checksum method.

Is there a way to check if the file system is corrupted after a forced read?

I'm asking to study!


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 19th, 2025, 22:52 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
taengukim wrote:
digisupport wrote:
If possible avoid writing anything to SA. Use write protection.
Read the necessary system files, how they are best read depends on the drive.
A lot of manual correction can be necessary, load into RAM and access data.

Part of the process is well documented in the manual and ACE blog.


Thank you for your response.

I read the article to activate the protection option, read the system file and applied it to low quality REM.

But is there a way to check the checksum when there is an error in the system file??

I'm curious about the checksum method.

Is there a way to check if the file system is corrupted after a forced read?

I'm asking to study!


I want to study about this function.
But how should I study this function?
If the original is broken, I wonder how I can check the checksum and how I can do it if both the fixed one and the original one are broken.


Attachments:
3.png
3.png [ 71.17 KiB | Viewed 16989 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 20th, 2025, 0:55 
Offline

Joined: October 3rd, 2005, 0:40
Posts: 4753
Location: Hungary
use good ones first to analyze the structure and find out CS protected blocks, etc

_________________
Adatmentés - Data recovery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: I'm curious about smr such as Seagate Rosewood Mobile.
PostPosted: March 20th, 2025, 2:35 
Offline

Joined: June 3rd, 2024, 0:06
Posts: 26
Location: 대한민국 서울특별시 송파구 문정동 96-6
pepe wrote:
use good ones first to analyze the structure and find out CS protected blocks, etc

Thank you for your answer!
Is it correct to buy a good one first and study firmware in it?
Thank you!


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 10 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group