Switch to full style
In-depth technology research: finding new ways to recover data, accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust.

Forum rules

Please do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...
Post a reply

Guzik

August 13th, 2009, 11:26

Does anyone have one of these ?

http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&STORY=/www/story/08-12-2009/0005076750&EDATE


http://www.guzik.com/product_detail_DTR3000.asp

Can it really recover data from major hard drives manufactures ?

Re: Guzik

August 16th, 2009, 14:06

Theoretically, yes. But for practical, commercial applications - NO.

I've seen one in a lab but have not yet seen real life results.

To put it simply, you can read the low level data, but trying reconstruct it into meaningful data is the problem.

Re: Guzik

August 17th, 2009, 14:57

What is the difference between this and "Signal Trace" that ActionFront promoted? I'd be needing to see a lot more unrecoverable projects before I'd spend more than $500,000 on this unit.

Re: Guzik

August 17th, 2009, 15:51

lcoughey wrote:What is the difference between this and "Signal Trace" that ActionFront promoted?

The difference is the Signal Trace is able to recover real data from some drives

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 4:09

lcoughey wrote:What is the difference between this and "Signal Trace" that ActionFront promoted? I'd be needing to see a lot more unrecoverable projects before I'd spend more than $500,000 on this unit.

The difference is that Guzik's seems to be a real hardware tool, while Actionfront's was fakeware (*)
(*) also known as vaporware, marketing promotional tool, or in simpler words ... just a big lie 8)

-BR-

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 7:12

I'd like to see some proof.

Actionfront woudn't be the first to create a fictional tool to get extra good press. I'm sure IBAS claimed to have such a device too. Don't forget Data Clinic with their EMAK, (then they started to sell Salvation Data products???) and Retro Data with their 20 ton P.E.T.S (Platter swap tool)

:roll: :roll: :roll:

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 13:06

the SignalTrace is real thing
I saw it myself and I saw it recovers data

There is no magic just pure science and lots of work

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 13:15

I'm curious to know the value of the data on the drives that would make systems like Guzik and Signal Trace a viable option.

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 14:21

was it just one model of western digital or several?

Re: Guzik

August 18th, 2009, 15:04

HDD Spaz wrote:was it just one model of western digital or several?

several WDs

Re: Guzik

August 20th, 2009, 6:38

probably all from the Enterprise range :O) . Signal Trace was good and they made their money back selling it to US gov.. Also Nick made money in the end by selling AF to Seagate./

I personaly think money was made off the back and brains of Russian nationals.

AF was miles behind in 2001/2002 Sadly some really clever guys ended up in the US

The best man-brain for reverse HDD firmware luckily still lives in Moscow so I don't care much :mrgreen: and he is the real GURU

Re: Guzik

August 20th, 2009, 10:58

guru, what guy are you talking about?
Post a reply