Switch to full style
In-depth technology research: finding new ways to recover data, accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust.

Forum rules

Please do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...
Post a reply

Samsung vs. WD

March 23rd, 2010, 17:52

I'm having two 1TB Seagate drives replaced under warranty.

Does anyone have a preference of Samsung or Western Digital Drives?

My OS drive is a Samsung SSD.

For this reason, the tech was leaning towards two Samsung 1TB drives.

Anyone have any insight to offer on this decision?

Thanks in advance.

Re: Samsung vs. WD

March 23rd, 2010, 17:58

If you look up all the problems with WD and what is noted on them in the forum it is no question Samsung is the better drive for what you want

Re: Samsung vs. WD

March 23rd, 2010, 18:27

bill4d wrote:I'm having two 1TB Seagate drives replaced under warranty.

Does anyone have a preference of Samsung or Western Digital Drives?

My OS drive is a Samsung SSD.

For this reason, the tech was leaning towards two Samsung 1TB drives.

Anyone have any insight to offer on this decision?

Thanks in advance.


Hi,

SSD is a good toy for example to store the OS, but don't trust it at all, and don't store any valuable on it....

If you want reliable hdd, buy Hitachi CLA, SLA, ALA drives, or Samsung models.
(This question depends on the location, for example here in Hungary, we have a lot of crap quality samsung drives, wich dies under the half of the warranty, or in the first 1-3 months.
The WD is really bad decision here, more worst than samsung.)

General good tip for drives "before you start using":
If you buy any big (>500GB) hdd, first plug it in to an linux box, and run the badblocks -vvw on int.
It will take a lot of time, but in the end, the drive will do reallocations if there is any weak area of the platters.
IMHO i don't use any of the drives wich adds to the G list during this test. (check this with smartctl)
Better idea to sell it, and buy another one.

Janos

Re: Samsung vs. WD

March 24th, 2010, 4:04

My personal preference for reliability is Samsung, not the worlds quickest but good solid drives.

Hitachi always come across as a bit "cheap and nasty" to me, but that's just my view.

Re: Samsung vs. WD

March 24th, 2010, 8:33

I would stick with seagate. Generally very recoverable. I don't think I have seen a 7200.11 with a head crash, they usually fail well before that stage. As long as you got backups, it doesn't matter what drives you use.

I also vote samsung, seem very well made. I would say its the VW of the HDD world.

Re: Samsung vs. WD

March 24th, 2010, 11:21

I've had plenty of problems with my VW...
Post a reply