May 18th, 2010, 10:00
May 18th, 2010, 10:16
May 19th, 2010, 14:06
May 31st, 2010, 21:36
November 8th, 2010, 18:12
November 8th, 2010, 22:00
November 11th, 2010, 14:16
February 2nd, 2011, 11:42
February 2nd, 2011, 12:02
cyborg1024 wrote:I have a question, recently got an SSD and somehow using Acronis got the Alignment out of whack even following their cloning procedures for these drives. I went ahead an purchased Paragon Alignment tool to correct the disk. The catch is the tool showed a number of my other drives out of alignment, all of which had been formated using Windows 7 which should automatically set the sector size correct. Since I had the tool to correct and it reported them being misaligned I went ahead and ran it. Now my concern is that those drives are not advanced format drives and may experience a performance hit rather than a benefit. Is it ok to run a drive designed for 512 byte sectors and have it aligned for 4K or does that cause a negative impact. If so I have a beef with Paragon as their utility is recommending that drives be aligned that shouldn't be. I dont suppose their is an easy way to undo that change either. On one of the disks I plan to image it to an SSD so it will be prepped for that and can be reformated if needed. I just dont want to use the utility on any of my other drives until I know if its a benefit or negative. I guess benching them before an after and running backups may be the only way unless someone knows the answer to this. I havent found much info on setting sectors of older drives to 4096. Thanks!
February 2nd, 2011, 13:03
February 2nd, 2011, 17:03
cyborg1024 wrote:I just read on one of the other forums that the Paragon Tool will tell you old drives need to be aligned when in-fact they do not. Only newer drives with Advanced formatting/SSD's need this. It irks me that the tool tells you drives need to be aligned when they don't. My large 2TB drive showed up as aligned which is one of my newest disks. The big question now is do I need to put my data back the way it was for optimal performance. I have a couple tickets in with Paragon but so far they havent responded back. I dont mind the larger sector size as long as it doesn't cause issues. Im my case it wont be too big an issue as I will only have one drive that I cant easily re-adjust with a restored image. Still why take the risk of data loss when aligning if its not even a benefit. The designers of the tool should have an advanced mode, and give the customer the ability to select sector size or ask if the disk is a legacy drive. Just my 2 cents! I was wondering why so many of my disks were listed out of whack when everything I've read says Win7 does this automatically.
February 2nd, 2011, 23:52
November 7th, 2012, 13:50
November 7th, 2012, 14:08
dantes666 wrote:i need alignment tool for this hdd.
[...]
The problem is the hdd freezer whith out reason.
November 7th, 2012, 14:42
February 18th, 2013, 5:44
August 27th, 2013, 3:36
August 27th, 2013, 4:23
most times this is a fallacy. It either runs or it doesnt.i used on car diagnostics and most of the tools for that business run better in XP environment.
August 27th, 2013, 7:56
bubu782001 wrote:I think this hard drive is 4k native (it doesn't emulate 512 bytes sectors).
August 27th, 2013, 11:11
Bytes per sector (HOST) - 512
Bytes per sector (DISK) - 4096
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.