In-depth technology research: finding new ways to recover data, accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust.
Forum rules
Please
do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use
this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...
July 5th, 2011, 18:46
Hi guys,
I need to choose a portable 2,5" HDD for my own purposes.
I am wondering which brand You trust?
My requirements:
- 2 x 500GB HDD with almost identical SN or PN (in case first drive fails I will have second one as a donor for HSA or PCB replacement)
- 2,5" Enclosure with USB 3.0
I think about Samsung HM500xx or Seagate ST9500420AS.
Do You think it's a good choice or shall I take another model?
Waiting for comments.
July 6th, 2011, 6:31
All drives fail sooner or later for the same or different reasons.
July 6th, 2011, 7:05
Definetely You are right.
For example, I wouldn't choose:
- WD Passport Portable 2,5" because some of them are equipped with Initio chip and the PCB is based on USB, so in case of failure, it could be difficult repair or recover the data.
- Toshiba because of known bearing problems with some models.
Paying attention to the fact that it's just a matter of time, when the drive dies, it's good to know which HDD models are recommended or preffered by DR pros for their own purposes

If You need to choose a 500GB portable drive with SATA interface, which one would You choose?
(having on mind:
- Your own experience and observations related to repair of 2,5" HDD's,
- high probability of repair, in case the drive fails).
All coments are appreciated.
July 6th, 2011, 9:23
VoodooPL wrote:2 x 500GB HDD with almost identical SN or PN (in case first drive fails I will have second one as a donor for HSA or PCB replacement)
Why try to plan for data recovery? Just use the second one to keep a backup.
IMO all the discussion of "which drive is better/more reliable/etc" is completely pointless. HD failure is by definition unexpected. All you can do is make backups so that if/when failure DOES happen, you don't have to worry about it.
July 6th, 2011, 9:56
Thumbs Up for Hitachi Internal or External drives. Long live hitachi
July 6th, 2011, 12:59
Seagate Momentus are a good drive... But really, the second disk should be used as a backup... Makes life cheaper and easer.
Shane
July 7th, 2011, 9:15
Strange concept to buy two so that you can use the one for parts to repair the other in future!? Just make a decent, regular backup.
The discussion about which drive manufacturer is better has been seen countless times on countless forums and has little or no value in my opinion. Sure, certain brands/models might have their weaknesses or strengths in certain aspects, but if you have bad luck on your side it doesn't matter what drive you buy.
Backup backup backup.
July 7th, 2011, 13:09
Thanks guys for answers.
Need to explain the idea of 2x500GB drives.
Well, I've got two options:
1. make a regular backup according to Your suggestion (similar to RAID-1) but then total storage area is only 500GB
2. use separately same drives (probability that two drives fail in the same time is very small), in case one fails, I'll make a 1:1 of working one to another HDD, and use spares of working one. Total storage area in that case is 1TB.
Of course, You are right. The first method is the best one for very important files, but for (mp3, movies, iso, etc.) i think 2nd one could be ok. If the recovery will not work, so the pesimistic option is to download the files again.
July 7th, 2011, 13:56
At least here in the US, the price difference between a 500GB 2.5" USB3 drive and a 1TB 2.5" USB3 drive is $35 (about 25 Euro). For me there is no question whether to pay an extra 50 Euro and keep a backup or save 50 Euro and rely on (in no means guaranteed to work) potential physical recovery
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.