In-depth technology research: finding new ways to recover data, accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust.
Forum rules
Please
do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use
this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...
October 22nd, 2007, 5:50
Hi All,
It's been quiet from AF/STX for sometime. Is there anything new? Are they able to recover data from anything other than an OLD WD SCSI drive?
October 25th, 2007, 14:39
Nothing?
October 30th, 2007, 14:16
Dmitriy should know better but as far as I know they can read modern WD drives.
But of couse they mostly keep it for marketing puposes
October 31st, 2007, 9:13
That is correct, they can read WD hard drives. It's been done a year ago. I am not sure what's going on on that project now since I left AF/SDR, but I would assume that the development slowed down a little bit...
November 23rd, 2007, 14:30
the development slowed down, since u left
November 26th, 2007, 19:34
Just to clarify, I wasn't involved too much in the SignalTrace project, so my leaving per se shouldn't slow it down. There were other factors, but I am not sure if I can tell more

If there is anyone from SDR (I know for sure that we have people from SDR reading this forum), maybe they will shed some light on this.
April 10th, 2008, 11:20
development probably slowed down because they couldn't do it !!!
May 5th, 2008, 0:09
According to their website, they can use it with any drive.
http://services.seagate.com/signal_trace.aspx
May 7th, 2008, 15:33
From the article referenced:
"SignalTrace™ is the result of many years of research and a substantial investment of Seagate resources."
Perhaps Seagate should be considering more substantial investment into the development and manufacture of RELIABLE hard drives, rather than the rubbish they are currently producing.
I do not trust any hard drive manufacturer that has shares in, or owns, a data recovery business.
Duncan
May 7th, 2008, 17:43
Odiferous wrote:carlos wrote:I do not trust any hard drive manufacturer that has shares in, or owns, a data recovery business.
Well said, i'm sure you are not alone in thinking of this big scam. Make many useless unreliable drives. For bigger return of increased revenue, with data recovery.
May 12th, 2008, 17:21
who gives a c*ap. Im starting a Chinese Take Away.... There less of them than there are data recovery companies!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
July 11th, 2008, 22:43
Do they ever actually use that technology to recover data? Or is it stuck in a closet somewhere?
July 13th, 2008, 2:21
the only company who can pay for it is the usa govement or usa army.
oh yeah and allso bill gates too
but like i say if someone total smashes the hard drive up there never going
to be any information recoveredable
July 24th, 2008, 5:02
I don't think the US has any money anymore. Their bank rolled by China... funny but true....
Maybe we will see the white house on ebay some time soon.. LMAO
craig6928 wrote:the only company who can pay for it is the usa govement or usa army.
oh yeah and allso bill gates too
but like i say if someone total smashes the hard drive up there never going
to be any information recoveredable

July 24th, 2008, 19:39
Reading the platters directly? Well, it is not out because it is not possible in any reasonable time periods. I've heard of a project just like this one... I am not sure if it was this one or not, but they got to the point where they could do this for one family (or one model, I don't remember) of WD drives, but it was so horribly slow that it was practically useless...
July 24th, 2008, 20:28
Jinx wrote:I am not sure if it was this one or not, but they got to the point where they could do this for one family (or one model, I don't remember) of WD drives, but it was so horribly slow that it was practically useless...
rumours, rumours

SignalTrace can recover data from some drives and it is not "horribly slow" and apparently not usless. Real cases with real drives with real data were recovered with SignalTrace
July 25th, 2012, 12:50
I think this Signal Trace thing is a big fat lie. Sorry!
Having said that, I was wondering the other day if one with a powerfull microscope could scan the platters into a file (or several) and then mount these physical images (literally) and some kind of modified OCR techology (to recognize the magnetic blurr or something) to convert them into data...with the necessary adjustments (considering the empty spaces of the lists, the servo tracks or else).
It may sound crazy and impossible, I know. But I was just trying to find an intellectual way to bypass all the wizardry of the SA modules and their checksums, servo calibration, X-Y-Z-list and translator. Maybe optical recognition is the solution in the not so near future.
July 25th, 2012, 13:13
Signaltrace does exist, i know one of the guys who made it.
On the other hand, optical way is at least as hard (and expensive) as a signaltrace thing can be. Just a little bit more

Translator is one thing (the easier one to be precise) , data decoding is what you would need to mess with...
September 5th, 2012, 8:02
rommano wrote:I think this Signal Trace thing is a big fat lie. Sorry!
Having said that, I was wondering the other day if one with a powerfull microscope could scan the platters into a file (or several) and then mount these physical images (literally) and some kind of modified OCR techology (to recognize the magnetic blurr or something) to convert them into data...with the necessary adjustments (considering the empty spaces of the lists, the servo tracks or else).
It may sound crazy and impossible, I know. But I was just trying to find an intellectual way to bypass all the wizardry of the SA modules and their checksums, servo calibration, X-Y-Z-list and translator. Maybe optical recognition is the solution in the not so near future.
we will all buy Your tool
October 31st, 2012, 13:19
Signal Trace does definitely exist. It's not a lie, and it was already discussed and proved to some members of this community.
From other side, the cost of adding the new drive models to it is more than the revenue generated, so it's simply has no business sense with the current DR marked prices.
As of optical solution - it's WAY more complicated and slower, trust me.
Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group.