MultiDrive – free backup, clone & wipe disk utility from Atola Technology

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Forum rules


Please do not post questions about data recovery cases here (use this forum instead). This forum is for topics on finding new ways to recover data. Accessing firmware, writing programs, reading bits off the platter, recovering data from dust...



Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 1:54 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: May 13th, 2010, 11:17
Posts: 2848
Location: Kuwait
fzabkar wrote:
https://dokumen.pub/qdownload/the-ultimate-quotable-einstein-course-booknbsped-9781400835966.html

Albert Einstein wrote:
Many things which go under my name are badly translated from the German or are invented by other people.

To George Seldes, compiler of The Great Quotations (1960), cited in Kantha, An Einstein Dictionary, 175




https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QW_YM_cFUNI

_________________
Kuwait Data Recovery - UNIX GTC
The only reason for time is so that everything doesn't happen at once. By: Albert Einstein


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 12:00 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 29th, 2005, 12:02
Posts: 3592
Location: Chicago
Doomer wrote:
Are you saying that non-original 0x8003 makes all data scrambled?
This sounds impossible. AFAIK is not read by the drive and it's written only externally.
I can check it when I'm back at work but very likely you made a mistake somewhere during the test

I tested it
0x8003 and 0x8028 have no effect on drive's encryption

I took a Spyglass2UL and wrote the modules from a Charger - no effect on drive's encryption or capacity (not a surprise).

_________________
SAN, NAS, RAID, Server, and HDD Data Recovery.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 13:50 
Offline

Joined: May 30th, 2005, 17:07
Posts: 546
Mikippp wrote:
Capacity reduction works via a switch in module 02.
Simply change 80 to 00 in one place and the full disk capacity will be restored.

Mikippp


Hi,
Tested on WD50NDZW-11A8JS1

>ROM version............................. : 00.0AA
>ROM F/W version......................... : 0000000A
>Overlay F/W version..................... : 00.0BA
>Servo F/W version....................... : 03.7B

Mikippp


Attachments:
Spyg2ult.png
Spyg2ult.png [ 12.82 KiB | Viewed 137 times ]
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 14:14 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 17214
Location: Australia
Mikippp wrote:
Mikippp wrote:
Capacity reduction works via a switch in module 02.
Simply change 80 to 00 in one place and the full disk capacity will be restored.

Mikippp


Hi,
Tested on WD50NDZW-11A8JS1

It's at offset 0x46 in section 3. That was one of my candidates.


Attachments:
mod02dump.7z [3.46 KiB]
Downloaded 4 times

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 14:19 
Offline

Joined: October 3rd, 2005, 0:40
Posts: 4808
Location: Hungary
without research, merely supposition: when a true SED drive is locked by pw using the wd sw, the bridge must present something to the host for the user to be able to unlock it, and that's the vcd partition. It is likely read from the 'missing' area by the bridge in some way. But this area does not contain any info related to decryption keys, only the sw, most probably. Basically the 'who cares' type of info for me, there are lot more interesting things about these drives...

_________________
Adatmentés - Data recovery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 14:40 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 17214
Location: Australia
pepe wrote:
without research, merely supposition: when a true SED drive is locked by pw using the wd sw, the bridge must present something to the host for the user to be able to unlock it, and that's the vcd partition. It is likely read from the 'missing' area by the bridge in some way. But this area does not contain any info related to decryption keys, only the sw, most probably. Basically the 'who cares' type of info for me, there are lot more interesting things about these drives...

I now realise that this area is not important for data recovery purposes, but I'm still interested to see what's there. The interesting thing, at least for me, is that the VCD area that is hidden by the bridge is actually larger than the 65536 sectors that are hidden by the SATA HDD.

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 19:46 
Offline

Joined: October 3rd, 2005, 0:40
Posts: 4808
Location: Hungary
how do you know the size of the VCD area?

_________________
Adatmentés - Data recovery


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Yesterday, 19:47 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: September 8th, 2009, 18:21
Posts: 17214
Location: Australia
See my other thread.

_________________
A backup a day keeps DR away.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: WD MCU - No more...
PostPosted: Today, 2:03 
Offline

Joined: June 25th, 2006, 13:51
Posts: 143
Location: Italy
@einstein9

I suppose you say it is not 1,2,3 because it is required to solder some micro tin wire to some of the MCU I/O pins

and the second part could be setting up the R/W operations

would you like to share the difficulties?

Just in case, thank you in advance

R.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 109 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6

All times are UTC - 5 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group